Re: critical Lily to PDF question

2002-08-29 Thread Thomas Willhalm
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 11:26:14AM +0200, Mats Bengtsson wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 04:34:27PM +0200, Mats Bengtsson wrote: > > > > > > > > Alternative 1 (single .ly file, you get just the music no titles): > > > > >>lilypond file.ly > > > > >>pdftex file.tex > > > > > > I was wrong abou

Re: critical Lily to PDF question

2002-08-29 Thread Mats Bengtsson
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 04:34:27PM +0200, Mats Bengtsson wrote: > > > > > > Alternative 1 (single .ly file, you get just the music no titles): > > > >>lilypond file.ly > > > >>pdftex file.tex > > > > I was wrong about this one. In principle, it should be possible > > to do > > >> lilypond -fp

Re: critical Lily to PDF question

2002-08-28 Thread Thomas Willhalm
On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 04:34:27PM +0200, Mats Bengtsson wrote: > > > > Alternative 1 (single .ly file, you get just the music no titles): > > >>lilypond file.ly > > >>pdftex file.tex > > I was wrong about this one. In principle, it should be possible > to do > >> lilypond -fpdftex file.ly > >>

Re: critical Lily to PDF question

2002-08-16 Thread Mats Bengtsson
> 1) Alternative 3B would be ideal for me, since that is exactly the > situation. But the problem is that I have cgwin in one directory and Miktex > in another and I think lilypond-book will not be able to find all the files > included (I have a lot of "input filename" for each chapter. But this

Re: critical Lily to PDF question

2002-08-16 Thread Carlos
uot;LilyPond User" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 4:34 PM Subject: Re: critical Lily to PDF question > > Do you mean running dvips directly on x.ly file? Without previously > > running Lilypond ? > > Alternative 1 (single .ly file, you get just the

Re: critical Lily to PDF question

2002-08-16 Thread Mats Bengtsson
> > Do you mean running dvips directly on x.ly file? Without previously > > running Lilypond ? > > Alternative 1 (single .ly file, you get just the music no titles): > >>lilypond file.ly > >>pdftex file.tex I was wrong about this one. In principle, it should be possible to do >> lilypond -f

Re: critical Lily to PDF question

2002-08-16 Thread Mats Bengtsson
out any page margings or anything, just > the figure itself, I will be done. > > Thanks > > Carlos > > - Original Message - > From: "Han-Wen Nienhuys" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Carlos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: "LilyPond U

Re: critical Lily to PDF question

2002-08-16 Thread Carlos
- Original Message - From: "Han-Wen Nienhuys" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Carlos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "LilyPond User" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 3:05 PM Subject: critical Lily to PDF question > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writ

Re: critical Lily to PDF question

2002-08-16 Thread Mats Bengtsson
I had just started to investigate your previous question, but this one is easier to answer. If you take a look at the FAQ for pdftex (`texdoc pdfTeX-FAQ` in teTeX), you'll learn that there is a small program epstopdf that performs the conversion. Just run epstopdf on each generated lily-xxx.eps

critical Lily to PDF question

2002-08-16 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Sorry, I am back with my question about how to integrate lilypond into > pdftex Why? (why not simply use dvips and ps2pdf?) -- Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED]| http://www.cs.uu.nl/~hanwen/ ___ Lilypond-user

critical Lily to PDF question

2002-08-16 Thread Carlos
Sorry, I am back with my question about how to integrate lilypond into pdftex I have found that \documentclass {article} \begin {document} This is an example \lilypond {c' d' e' f' g' a' b'} \end {document} generates a eps file which can be eventually converted to pdf with ghostview, the pro