Re: automatic fingering annotation

2014-10-14 Thread David Nalesnik
Hi Erik, On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 1:28 PM, erik flister wrote: > thanks a lot david, i learned a lot from studying this! > > Glad to hear it! > looks like there would be two options to get lilypond to report pitch info: > > \void \displayLilyMusic % types absolute pitches to console > \in

Re: automatic fingering annotation

2014-10-14 Thread erik flister
thanks a lot david, i learned a lot from studying this! looks like there would be two options to get lilypond to report pitch info: \void \displayLilyMusic % types absolute pitches to console \include "event-listener.ly" % writes file w/midi numbers but your example inspired me to figure

Re: automatic fingering annotation

2014-10-12 Thread Simon Albrecht
ng-pitches#relative-octave-entry), but i don't want to reimplement relative octave detection (not because it's hard, but i in principle don't want to duplicate logic). i would think automatic fingering annotation would be a desirable feature in lilypond itself -- per

Re: automatic fingering annotation

2014-10-12 Thread David Nalesnik
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 9:34 AM, David Nalesnik wrote: > > > It is possible to create markups in the score through a Scheme engraver. > The one I've attached looks for a NoteHead that has had its > 'display-property property set to #t. > > I mean 'display-fingering... _

Re: automatic fingering annotation

2014-10-12 Thread David Nalesnik
octave detection (not because > it's hard, but i in principle don't want to duplicate logic). > > i would think automatic fingering annotation would be a desirable > feature in lilypond itself -- perhaps a markup flag where i request > the standard fingering for the note

automatic fingering annotation

2014-10-12 Thread erik flister
i want to support relative octave entry (http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/notation/writing-pitches#relative-octave-entry), but i don't want to reimplement relative octave detection (not because it's hard, but i in principle don't want to duplicate logic). i would