2013/9/30 Alexander Kobel
> On 09/30/2013 10:23 AM, Urs Liska wrote:
>
>> Am 28.09.2013 00:10, schrieb Franciszek Boehlke:
>>
>>> 2013/9/27 Alexander Kobel
>>>
>>> I have not real experiance in using git that way, but can imagine a
>>> bit how
>>> does it work. I think there are two main ways yo
On 09/30/2013 10:23 AM, Urs Liska wrote:
Am 28.09.2013 00:10, schrieb Franciszek Boehlke:
2013/9/27 Alexander Kobel
I have not real experiance in using git that way, but can imagine a
bit how
does it work. I think there are two main ways you can go, and possibly
using submodules is the third.
Am 28.09.2013 00:10, schrieb Franciszek Boehlke:
2013/9/27 Alexander Kobel
I have not real experiance in using git that way, but can imagine a bit how
does it work. I think there are two main ways you can go, and possibly
using submodules is the third.
One way (which i would recommend) is work
2013/9/27 Alexander Kobel
> Dear all,
>
> long time ago there was this thread about version controlling Lily scores,
> and much more recently Urs' excellent essay and tutorial on the LilyPond
> blog [1].
>
> Now, that surely is a great read, but I'm left with one question. Over
> time, I've colle
On 09/27/2013 10:53 PM, Curt wrote:
This is a common problem in software engineering. [...]
I assumed so; I don't experience it in the projects I'm currently
involved in, but I am sure it is well studied.
For a git-only approach, the *classic* way of handling this - and I
haven't yet tried
This is a common problem in software engineering. In my day job as a java
developer we use something called archiva which collects multiple versions of
the libraries we depend on. So if projectA (like your score) depends on
version 1.1 of a library (like your tweaks), while another project dep
- Original Message -
From: "Alec Bartsch"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Alexander Kobel" ; "Urs Liska" ;
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2013 5:20 PM
Subject: Re: Re[surrecting]: Version Control and Public Repository
On Sep 27, 2013, at 3:50 AM, Phil
On Sep 27, 2013, at 3:50 AM, Phil Holmes wrote:
> If you have scoreA.ly and this includes my-tweak.ily and you create a commit
> in the git repo for this music, no matter how often you then alter my-tweak,
> you could always return to the commit for this music, and my-tweak will
> always be a
Hi Alexander,
of course I'm interested in this topic ;-) but I have a concert tonight
(anybody in/near Gelsenkirchen?) So I don't know if I can answer in detail
today ...
Best
Urs
Alexander Kobel schrieb:
>Dear all,
>
>long time ago there was this thread about version controlling Lily
>sco
- Original Message -
From: "Alexander Kobel"
To: "Urs Liska"
Cc:
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2013 10:11 AM
Subject: Re[surrecting]: Version Control and Public Repository
Dear all,
long time ago there was this thread about version controlling Lily scores,
an
Dear all,
long time ago there was this thread about version controlling Lily
scores, and much more recently Urs' excellent essay and tutorial on the
LilyPond blog [1].
Now, that surely is a great read, but I'm left with one question. Over
time, I've collected a few scores, made with differen
Now thats a useful information..i will ask a lawyer here in croatia and
report what i heard.
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 7:33 PM, martinwguy wrote:
> On 11 November 2012 18:39, Francisco Vila wrote:
> >> and i transcribed (by ear) many scores i don't have rights for..
> >>
> >> how do you handle t
On 11 November 2012 18:39, Francisco Vila wrote:
>> and i transcribed (by ear) many scores i don't have rights for..
>>
>> how do you handle this kind of staff..
>> What are the laws related to such situations?!
>
> I think copyright laws are clear, regardless of whether you
> transcribed it by ea
Am 11.11.2012 17:43, schrieb Stjepan Horvat:
hi..i have the same question..?!
I reed somewhere that git isn'tintended for binary packages..
What Git does is comparing files line by line, which essentially works
only for text files.
It stores the differences between the files which can be a singl
Thanks guys..this was unclear to me..
..so Copyright is the key word..
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 7:00 PM, Urs Liska wrote:
> Am 11.11.2012 19:02, schrieb Federico Bruni:
>
> Il 11/11/2012 18:54, Stjepan Horvat ha scritto:
>>
>>> And is puting it on the web for example github ("public") illegal..
Am 11.11.2012 19:02, schrieb Federico Bruni:
Il 11/11/2012 18:54, Stjepan Horvat ha scritto:
And is puting it on the web for example github ("public") illegal..?!
Sure it's illegal, if material is copyrighted and you don't have the
rights.
If you use a private repository I think it's ok.
Of
Il 11/11/2012 18:54, Stjepan Horvat ha scritto:
And is puting it on the web for example github ("public") illegal..?!
Sure it's illegal, if material is copyrighted and you don't have the rights.
If you use a private repository I think it's ok.
___
l
And is puting it on the web for example github ("public") illegal..?!
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 6:39 PM, Francisco Vila wrote:
> 2012/11/11 Stjepan Horvat :
> > I reed somewhere that git isn't intended for binary packages..
>
> Humans are not intended for tracking per-line changes on binary files,
2012/11/11 Stjepan Horvat :
> I reed somewhere that git isn't intended for binary packages..
Humans are not intended for tracking per-line changes on binary files,
either. Git can do it, for example people adds videos to git repos,
but it is not of great help except that you can mix binaries with
hi..i have the same question..?!
I reed somewhere that git isn't intended for binary packages..
and i transcribed (by ear) many scores i don't have rights for..
how do you handle this kind of staff..
What are the laws related to such situations?!
this is what my brother and i are working on
https
Thanks Francisco. It's fixed.
-M.
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 5:16 AM, Francisco Vila wrote:
> 2012/11/10 Mike Blackstock :
> > You can generate your own lilypond scores page at www.omet.ca. Just
> upload
> > your sources, compile them, and you'll get a page like this:
> >
> > http://www.omet.ca/scor
Il 09/11/2012 21:57, Nick Payne ha scritto:
On 10/11/12 03:08, Urs Liska wrote:
Re public repositories: Do you know mutopiaproject.org? Is that what
you mean?
Mutopiaproject seems pretty dead. No scores have appeared there since 12
February, including a couple that I sent them subsequent to t
2012/11/10 Lucas Gonze :
> I wonder whether there are other Lilypond users who share their scores
> openly on Github. Am I the first? That seems unlikely.
I have something in http://repo.or.cz/w/lilypond-ejercicios.git
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com
2012/11/10 Mike Blackstock :
> You can generate your own lilypond scores page at www.omet.ca. Just upload
> your sources, compile them, and you'll get a page like this:
>
> http://www.omet.ca/scores/Mike_Blackstock_2/
I hadn't noticed before: source view in omet.ca does not escape < and
> for chor
You can generate your own lilypond scores page at www.omet.ca. Just upload
your sources, compile them, and you'll get a page like this:
http://www.omet.ca/scores/Mike_Blackstock_2/
It also also has musicXML to lilypond conversion online; there's lots of
musicXML scores out there on the web.
Che
On 10 November 2012 07:40, martinwguy wrote:
> On 10 November 2012 00:22, Lucas Gonze wrote:
>> I wonder whether there are other Lilypond users who share their scores
>> openly on Github. Am I the first? That seems unlikely.
>
> Dunno. When did you start?
> https://github.com/martinwguy/delia-der
On 10 November 2012 00:22, Lucas Gonze wrote:
> I wonder whether there are other Lilypond users who share their scores
> openly on Github. Am I the first? That seems unlikely.
Dunno. When did you start?
https://github.com/martinwguy/delia-derbyshire/tree/master/scores
M
_
On 10/11/12 03:08, Urs Liska wrote:
>
> Re public repositories: Do you know mutopiaproject.org? Is that what
> you mean?
>
Mutopiaproject seems pretty dead. No scores have appeared there since 12
February, including a couple that I sent them subsequent to that date,
and they don't answer their e-ma
On Nov 9, 2012 4:22 PM, "Lucas Gonze" wrote:
> I wonder whether there are other Lilypond users who share their scores
> openly on Github. Am I the first? That seems unlikely.
There are quite a few if you look around.
-Jay
___
lilypond-user mailing
I wonder whether there are other Lilypond users who share their scores
openly on Github. Am I the first? That seems unlikely.
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Lucas Gonze wrote:
> As wonderful as Mutopia is, it can't be the home of all open scores.
> It would be good to have an aggregator-based ap
As wonderful as Mutopia is, it can't be the home of all open scores.
It would be good to have an aggregator-based approach rather than one
where everybody uses the same repo.
Personally, I use Github whenever I make a Lilypond score of a public
domain source. See:
https://github.com/lucasgonze/
Am 09.11.2012 17:54, schrieb Wim van Dommelen:
Try IMSLP to start with. Tons of very interesting music available there.
http://imslp.org/
Regards,
Wim.
Yes, that's what I'd said also (if I understand you right that you are
looking for score that can be recreated with LilyPond).
The offer mu
Try IMSLP to start with. Tons of very interesting music available there.
http://imslp.org/
Regards,
Wim.
On 9 Nov 2012, at 17:32 , Federico Bruni wrote:
2012/11/9 Urs Liska :
Re public repositories: Do you know mutopiaproject.org? Is that
what you
mean?
and it's on git:
https://github
2012/11/9 Urs Liska :
> Re public repositories: Do you know mutopiaproject.org? Is that what you
> mean?
and it's on git:
https://github.com/chrissawer/The-Mutopia-Project
I think that an information missing here[1] is where you can retrieve
public domain scores to be digitalized (lilypondized?).
Yes, I started using Git for the same reason several months ago, and I'm
still thrilled by the implications this has.
It is really perfect to be able to version-control ones sources.
But it's even better for collaborating - working together at the same
files while nearly not having to worry abou
Dear lovely LilyPond community,
I am wondering if there's already a public repository to upload LilyPond
code of full works that are not just useful snippets (which already
exists). If one doesn't already exist, would it be useful for people if I
set one up?
I use Git version control for all my L
36 matches
Mail list logo
