This is how it looks in LP 2.11.27.
No collisions! :)
2007/7/12, Valentin Villenave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
2007/7/12, Stan Sanderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Valentin, I get the output from Dominic's code which he complains about:
> (LP 2.10.25)
Yes, I can see that, but it doesn't collide here o
2007/7/12, Stan Sanderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Valentin, I get the output from Dominic's code which he complains about:
(LP 2.10.25)
Yes, I can see that, but it doesn't collide here on 2.11.27 (linux32).
This might have been fixed with the new spacing code or something,
which is why I asked Do
Dominic-
My apologies for not having seen the previous thread, but
the following changes to your code appear (to me) to resolve
the clash...
Stan
On Jul 12, 2007, at 2:02 PM, Dominic Neumann wrote:
Hi again,
I´m still searching for a way to solve this problem. Is there anyone
who has an ide
2007/7/12, Dominic Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi again,
Hi Dominic,
I´m still searching for a way to solve this problem. Is there anyone
who has an idea how to tweak lilypond?
I tried the snippet you posted, and as you can see the result doesn't
look ugly at all.
Have you tried with the
Hi again,
I´m still searching for a way to solve this problem. Is there anyone
who has an idea how to tweak lilypond?
Dominic
2007/3/15, Dominic Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
okay, sorry for not posting an example. It´s not that easy to find a
simple one, because in the simple situations there´
okay, sorry for not posting an example. It´s not that easy to find a
simple one, because in the simple situations there´s no problem with
the brackets. I already included the tipp for question 3 and it works
good.
There´s a problem with the collision of the bracket numbers and the chordnames.
%%
It is much easier to answer questions like these if you include an example
(short but complete so it can be ran directly through LilyPond)
of the LilyPond code that you used. Then anybody on the mailing list
who has an idea can quickly test it. Now, I would need to spend maybe
10 minutes to first
Hi,
2007/3/12, Cameron Horsburgh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Apologies in advance -- I'm not going to be much help!
Number one: check section 6.7.4 of the manual under 'Manual Repeats'.
If you manually specify the repeat (I agree, it's an ugly way to do
it) you can use a markup to specify the volta te
On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 05:17:52PM +0100, Dominic Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> when using volta brackets together with chordnames it doesnt look good to
> me.
> There are three problems:
>
> 1.) The font of the bracket numbers (1., 2., ...) doesnt look good. I
> want it to be the same font as the on
Hi,
when using volta brackets together with chordnames it doesnt look good to me.
There are three problems:
1.) The font of the bracket numbers (1., 2., ...) doesnt look good. I
want it to be the same font as the one that is used for chordnames. In
addition the baseline of the chordnames should
10 matches
Mail list logo
