Re: Typesetting "as near to Petrucci style as possible".

2016-10-07 Thread Simon Albrecht
On 07.10.2016 20:34, Richard Shann wrote: On Fri, 2016-10-07 at 12:13 -0400, Shane Brandes wrote: Did you mean a 16th century font? yes, the time signature font is one of the things that is looks rather heavy against the LilyPond Petrucci glyphs. There are the early time indicator glyphs of cou

Re: Typesetting "as near to Petrucci style as possible".

2016-10-07 Thread Richard Shann
On Fri, 2016-10-07 at 12:13 -0400, Shane Brandes wrote: > Did you mean a 16th century font? yes, the time signature font is one of the things that is looks rather heavy against the LilyPond Petrucci glyphs. There are the early time indicator glyphs of course, but the Rebel print isn't using them.

Re: Typesetting "as near to Petrucci style as possible".

2016-10-07 Thread Shane Brandes
Did you mean a 16th century font? On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 7:06 AM, Richard Shann wrote: > On Fri, 2016-10-07 at 10:52 +0100, Richard Shann wrote: >> On Fri, 2016-10-07 at 10:37 +0100, Phil Holmes wrote: >> > > seems identical with or without MultiMeasureRest.style = >> > #'neomensural >> > > and i

Re: Typesetting "as near to Petrucci style as possible".

2016-10-07 Thread Richard Shann
On Fri, 2016-10-07 at 10:52 +0100, Richard Shann wrote: > On Fri, 2016-10-07 at 10:37 +0100, Phil Holmes wrote: > > > seems identical with or without MultiMeasureRest.style = > > #'neomensural > > > and indeed with MultiMeasureRest.style = ##f too. > > > > > > > > > Richard > > > > > > Have you

Re: Typesetting "as near to Petrucci style as possible".

2016-10-07 Thread Richard Shann
On Fri, 2016-10-07 at 10:37 +0100, Phil Holmes wrote: > > seems identical with or without MultiMeasureRest.style = > #'neomensural > > and indeed with MultiMeasureRest.style = ##f too. > > > > > > Richard > > > Have you considered using r1 instead of R1? I don't know the era of > the > music y

Re: Typesetting "as near to Petrucci style as possible".

2016-10-07 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: "Richard Shann" To: "Malte Meyn" Cc: Sent: Friday, October 07, 2016 10:07 AM Subject: Re: Typesetting "as near to Petrucci style as possible". On Fri, 2016-10-07 at 09:54 +0100, Richard Shann wrote: On Fri, 2016-10-07 at

Re: Typesetting "as near to Petrucci style as possible".

2016-10-07 Thread Richard Shann
On Fri, 2016-10-07 at 09:54 +0100, Richard Shann wrote: > On Fri, 2016-10-07 at 10:03 +0200, Malte Meyn wrote: > > > > Am 07.10.2016 um 09:35 schrieb Richard Shann: > > > the R1*6/4 typesets as a classical whole bar > > > rest > > > > You would need a separate override for MultiMeasureRest: > >

Re: Typesetting "as near to Petrucci style as possible".

2016-10-07 Thread Richard Shann
On Fri, 2016-10-07 at 10:03 +0200, Malte Meyn wrote: > > Am 07.10.2016 um 09:35 schrieb Richard Shann: > > the R1*6/4 typesets as a classical whole bar > > rest > > You would need a separate override for MultiMeasureRest: > > \override MultiMeasureRest.style = #'neomensural Thanks, that w

Re: Typesetting "as near to Petrucci style as possible".

2016-10-07 Thread Malte Meyn
Am 07.10.2016 um 09:35 schrieb Richard Shann: the R1*6/4 typesets as a classical whole bar rest You would need a separate override for MultiMeasureRest: \override MultiMeasureRest.style = #'neomensural This is because MultiMeasureRest’s stencil doesn’t look for the style even thoug