On 7-Jun-05, at 2:13 AM, Robert Memering wrote:
As for the one-line-staff bug: Any news? Did you reproduce it?
I reproduced it in 2.5.27, but I didn't want to track it down at that
time. I tried
it again today (using 2.5.28), prepared to track it down, but it didn't
occur. The
template co
Am Sonntag, 5. Juni 2005 21:09 schrieb Graham Percival:
> Well, yes. We can't figure out what went wrong without an
> input file.
Nevermind, I figured it out myself. You were right, I was
actually doing something fancy. It was a bar-number trick
that I took from one of the example files:
\overri
On 5-Jun-05, at 4:24 AM, Robert Memering wrote:
Am Samstag, 4. Juni 2005 23:49 schrieb Graham Percival:
The attachment got cut off, but it looks like you're trying to do
something
fancy in scheme.
In fact, the attachment isn't cut off. This is the output.
If you're interested I can send you
Am Samstag, 4. Juni 2005 23:49 schrieb Graham Percival:
> > GNU LilyPond 2.5.27
> > »sicongieprens-neu.ly« wird verarbeitet
> > Analysieren...sicongieprens-neu.ly:1:48: In expression
> > (make-stencil-boxer 0.1
> > 0.25 ...):
> > sicongieprens-neu.ly:1:48: Wrong number of arguments to # > make-sten
Robert Memering kirjoitti:
compilation went quite smoothly.
at least I'm glad about this.
But it is not much use,
because none of my old 2.4.x scores work. I used convert-ly, but I
still have several problems. One score doesn't compile, and the
other ones have one-line-staves instead of five-li
On 4-Jun-05, at 10:25 AM, Robert Memering wrote:
I have deleted 2.4.4 and built 2.5.27 on SuSE now, and you are
right: compilation went quite smoothly. But it is not much use,
because none of my old 2.4.x scores work. I used convert-ly, but I
still have several problems. One score doesn't compil
Robert Memering wrote:
I have deleted 2.4.4 and built 2.5.27 on SuSE now, and you are
right: compilation went quite smoothly. But it is not much use,
because none of my old 2.4.x scores work. I used convert-ly, but I
still have several problems. One score doesn't compile, and the
other ones have
Am Samstag, 4. Juni 2005 06:27 schrieb Tapio Tuovila:
> I'd like to second Graham's opinion. Compiling 2.5.2x goes smoothly on
> suse 9.3; at least I have noticed no particular problem. And once you
> use 2.5.x you need not worry about dvips -sort of things.
I have deleted 2.4.4 and built 2.5.27 o
Robert Memering wrote:
- I have SuSE 9.3, lilypond 2.4.4.
- Lilypond works, dvi and midi output is fine.
- The integrated production of ps and pdf fails. I get documents
with many musical symbols missing and all wrong text fonts.
- invoking dvips (and ps2pdf) manually works, but produces very
ba
Robert Memering writes:
> My problem:
>
> - I have SuSE 9.3, lilypond 2.4.4.
> - Lilypond works, dvi and midi output is fine.
> - The integrated production of ps and pdf fails.
SUSE ships a broken LilyPond installation. Did you think of Solution:
report bug to SUSE?
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen
I would be very grateful for any help.
I don't know any Black Magic. You might have tried this
already, but I'd give 2.5.x a try. Hey, the worst that can happen
is that it fails, right? You could try the redhat rpm, but I'd go
straight
to the source tarball. Follow the instructions in th
On 3-Jun-05, at 5:27 PM, Robert Memering wrote:
Ok, it's just a matter of (mis-)configuration, then? Maybe, but
I'm so tired of wasting my time searching archives, trying
hundreds of promising "solutions" and still getting no results.
Why do the Windows and Mac people always get "standalone inst
12 matches
Mail list logo
