Mason Hock:
> Urs Liska:
>>
>> Actually I do not see why any of this should be incompatible. Both
>> page-layout and partial-compilation *use* the EE. Maybe it is a naming
>> conflict somehow.
>
> Here's a reduced example of what I have. Can you spot what I'm doing wrong?
>
> \version "2.19.80
Urs Liska:
>
>
> Am 27. Dezember 2017 18:32:00 MEZ schrieb Mason Hock :
>>> I usually use the EE to
>>> set the needed breaks:
>>> \editionModList breaksForTargetX sing.with.bach.Score \break 5,9,13,17
>>
>> Thanks, Jan-Peter. This works well, except that partial-complication
>> relied on the bre
Am 27. Dezember 2017 18:32:00 MEZ schrieb Mason Hock :
>>I usually use the EE to
>>set the needed breaks:
>>\editionModList breaksForTargetX sing.with.bach.Score \break 5,9,13,17
>
>Thanks, Jan-Peter. This works well, except that partial-complication
>relied on the break sets defined with page-la
>I usually use the EE to
>set the needed breaks:
>\editionModList breaksForTargetX sing.with.bach.Score \break 5,9,13,17
Thanks, Jan-Peter. This works well, except that partial-complication
relied on the break sets defined with page-layout.conditional-breaks. Do
you know if it is possible for part
Hi Mason,
I'll have to try if both modules are compatible. I usually use the EE to
set the needed breaks:
\editionModList breaksForTargetX sing.with.bach.Score \break 5,9,13,17
But both solutions shall not compete and I'll have a look into it in
January ;-)
Best
Jan-Peter
Am 26.12.2017 um
Thanks for clarifying, Jan-Peter. I think the point I was most confused
on was the x.y.z notation, but you response helped a lot. I now have
edition engraver working with
\addEdition violinI-letter
\editionMod violinI-letter 9 0/8 score.violinI.Voice \once \shapeII
#'(()()(p 110 .6)()) Slur
\cons
I might be doing wrong?
>>
>> Trevor
>>
>> -- Original Message --
>> From: "Jan-Peter Voigt" mailto:jp.vo...@gmx.de>>
>> To: lilypond-user@gnu.org <mailto:lilypond-user@gnu.org>; "Mason
>Hock"
>> mailto:masonh..
nd 2.19.80. Are there any such users?
Alternatively, any ideas what I might be doing wrong?
Trevor
-- Original Message --
From: "Jan-Peter Voigt" mailto:jp.vo...@gmx.de>>
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org <mailto:lilypond-user@gnu.org>; "Mason Hock"
mailto:masonh...@gma
Hello Mason,
it is possible to use \shapeII with the edition-engraver :-)
And it sounds like this is the use case the EE is originally meant for.
Yes, the wording is a bit inconsistent and/or irritating. I will try to
sum it up:
In the recent versions I used the terms target and context to divi
