Hi Trevor,
Could you please post the *full* log and the input file?
Then I can look into it. I recall having seen this error beforebut not what it
was about.
Urs
Am 26. Dezember 2017 13:08:49 MEZ schrieb Jan-Peter Voigt <jp.vo...@gmx.de>:
>Hi Trevor,
>
>I am working on Linux and have no Windows 10 running. I will try on
>Win7
>later. IIRC there was a problem with oll-core on Windows 10, but maybe
>someone else can tell?
>The error message indicates a problem before EE is loaded.
>If oll-core is loaded successfully EE *should* work.
>
>Jan-Peter
>
>
>Am 26.12.2017 um 09:41 schrieb Trevor:
>> Hi EE-Users
>>
>> I thought I'd try to bring the edition engraver into use over the
>> holiday period, so I cloned edition-engraver and oll-core from
>git-hub
>> into a local repository, placed that in Frescobaldi's include path
>and
>> tried to compile the first example in edition-engraver. It fails
>with
>> the message:
>>
>> C:/Users/tdani/openlilylib/oll-core/package.ily:57:2 <0>: error:
>GUILE
>> signaled an error for the expression beginning here
>>
>> #
>>
>> (if (not (defined? 'openlilylib-root))
>>
>>
>>
>C:/Users/tdani/AppData/Local/Temp/frescobaldi-u9vnw1qc/tmpuqjcysah/example-1.ly:35:1
>
>> <1>: error: unknown escaped string: `\loadPackage'
>>
>>
>> \loadPackage edition-engraver
>>
>> Before I spend time investigating this further, I'm wondering if the
>> edition-engraver is known to work within Frescobaldi on Windows 10
>with
>> LilyPond 2.19.80. Are there any such users?
>>
>> Alternatively, any ideas what I might be doing wrong?
>>
>> Trevor
>>
>> ------ Original Message ------
>> From: "Jan-Peter Voigt" <jp.vo...@gmx.de <mailto:jp.vo...@gmx.de>>
>> To: lilypond-user@gnu.org <mailto:lilypond-user@gnu.org>; "Mason
>Hock"
>> <masonh...@gmail.com <mailto:masonh...@gmail.com>>
>> Sent: 24/12/2017 10:19:48
>> Subject: Re: edition-editor usage
>>
>>> Hello Mason,
>>>
>>> it is possible to use \shapeII with the edition-engraver :-)
>>> And it sounds like this is the use case the EE is originally meant
>for.
>>>
>>> Yes, the wording is a bit inconsistent and/or irritating. I will try
>
>>> to sum it up:
>>> In the recent versions I used the terms target and context to divide
>
>>> two dimensions. The target names the requested output like for
>example
>>> 'fullscore' or 'violinI-part'. If you "activate" an edition-target
>>> with \addEdition violinI-part it uses all modifications that look
>like
>>> \editionMod violinI-part <measure> <moment> <edition-context> {
>>> \shapeII ... }
>>>
>>> This is a real example I used inside the piano reduction:
>>> \editionMod klavier 38 0/8 chor.ten.TenorStaff \once \shapeII
>#'(()(0
>>> . 1)()()) Slur
>>> It means:
>>> with edition-target 'klavier' (the piano reduction) in measure 38
>the
>>> first eighth apply the shapeII-command inside the context identified
>
>>> by 'chor.ten.TenorStaff'.
>>> Moments are counted zero-based, so the first moment is zero. This
>>> might irritating on first sight, but it is meaningful as the
>distance
>>> from the beginning of the measure. The context in the example above
>is
>>> the tenor staff inside the choir-staff.
>>>
>>> I think the main point is understanding the three dimensions:
>>> 1. the edition-target - that is the condition if to apply the
>>> modification ... apply this modification for the score of type
>T(arget)
>>> 2. the edition-context - that is where to apply the modification ...
>
>>> the LilyPond context like Voice, Staff, Score etc.
>>> 3. the time - that is the musical timestamp when to apply the
>>> modification ... moment X inside measure Y
>>>
>>> HTH
>>>
>>> I will send more details and information soon!
>>> But for today and tomorrow I wish you a merry Christmas and all the
>>> best for 2018!
>>>
>>> Jan-Peter
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 23. Dezember 2017 20:09:29 MEZ schrieb Mason Hock
>>> <masonh...@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>> I have a piece in which each performer reads from a version of
>the score
>>> with their staff full-sized with the other parts on small
>staves. This
>>> pieces also requires a lot of manual tweaking of slurs.
>>>
>>> I've been using \shapeII for the slurs, which works great,
>except that
>>> if I shape the slur correctly for the full-sized version of the
>part it
>>> is shaped incorrectly for the small version of the part and vice
>versa.
>>> In order for the slurs to look good in both situations I need
>two sets
>>> of \shapeII tweaks.
>>>
>>> edition-editor looks like a promising solution, but I'm having
>trouble
>>> learning how to use it. The only documentation I can find is the
>usage
>>> examples here.
>>>
>>>
>https://github.com/openlilylib/edition-engraver/tree/master/usage-examples
>>>
>>> Each example is very specific, which makes it difficult to
>decode how
>>> edition-engraver works in general. I guess my questions are
>>>
>>> (1) Will edition-engraver work for tweaking slurs with \shapeII?
>>>
>>> (2) If so, what should be my approach in terms of organization?
>My guess
>>> would be to have 8 editions, a full-size version and small
>version for
>>> each of the 4 staves, where each pdf uses 1 full-size edition
>and 3
>>> small editions.
>>>
>>> (3) How do I make certain 'editions' (at this point I'm
>questioning
>>> whether I'm using that term correctly) apply to certain staves
>in each pdf?
>>>
>>> (4) What is the basic syntax for using edition-editor? It's
>difficult to
>>> tell from the examples in the repo what is the basic syntax and
>what is
>>> extending it.
>>>
>>> Thanks to anyone who can clarify.
>>>
>>> Mason
>>>
>>>
>>>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> lilypond-user mailing list
>>> lilypond-user@gnu.org
>>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>>>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>lilypond-user mailing list
>lilypond-user@gnu.org
>https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
--
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Gerät mit K-9 Mail gesendet._______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
