And of course KDE is nice. And if you use Kubuntu then it's installed by
default.
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 7:30 AM, Shane Brandes wrote:
> XFCE is also a useful desktop interface. Unity might be good for
> tablet minded people but, at least, I found it to be highly disruptive
> of making any sort
XFCE is also a useful desktop interface. Unity might be good for
tablet minded people but, at least, I found it to be highly disruptive
of making any sort of useful workflow. Whichever shell one chooses
Lilypond always performs excellently.
Shane Brandes
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 8:41 AM, Bric wrot
On 11/03/2014 08:09 AM, Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
On Mon, 3 Nov 2014, Bric wrote:
One particular, however: I would stay away from "Unity", and opt for
"GNOME" during installation. Someone could still correct me and
persuade me about the glory of Unity, but I have instinctively
disliked it f
On Mon, 3 Nov 2014, Bric wrote:
One particular, however: I would stay away from "Unity", and opt for "GNOME"
during installation. Someone could still correct me and persuade me about
the glory of Unity, but I have instinctively disliked it from its inception,
and am happily using the "trad
On 11/02/2014 05:22 AM, Jay Vara wrote:
Yes, you are right. The unicode fonts failed on 2.19.5. I even tried
the new windows 10 and it failed.
Now that I know it works on linux (thanks to Bric), I will try to get
access to linux using virtual box and try it out.
Just my two cents about Linux
Yes, you are right. The unicode fonts failed on 2.19.5. I even tried the
new windows 10 and it failed.
Now that I know it works on linux (thanks to Bric), I will try to get
access to linux using virtual box and try it out.
On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> > If it works
> If it works on Linux, I may have a way to get Linux on the windows
> PC using Virtual Box. On the other hand I am using version 2.18.2 -
> perhaps I should try 2.19.5 first.
I fear that 2.19.5 will fail on Windows as 2.18.2 does.
Werner
___
lil
If it works on Linux, I may have a way to get Linux on the windows PC using
Virtual Box. On the other hand I am using version 2.18.2 - perhaps I should
try 2.19.5 first.
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Unicode-Font-Issues-tp168122p168243.html
Sent from the
My failure with the Tamil script was also on Windows.
It is obviously time for me to switch to Linux :-)
-- Jean-Luc Chevillard (Paris)
"https://univ-paris-diderot.academia.edu/JeanLucChevillard";
"https://plus.google.com/u/0/113653379205101980081/posts/p/pub";
"https://twitter.com/JLC1956";
>> I tried to use unicode fonts for the lyrics. While the fonts show
>> perfectly well in the input file, the output is not correct. Is
>> there a workaround?
>
> If the bottom one is correct then it is rendering correctly on
> Ubuntu 14.04, lilypond 2.19.3.
... This means we are again bitten by
On 10/31/2014 07:29 AM, Jay Vara wrote:
I tried to use unicode fonts for the lyrics. While the fonts show
perfectly well in the input file, the output is not correct. Is there
a workaround?
%%
\version "2.18.2"
\score {
\new Staff \relative c' {
<<
{c2 d
Greetings from Paris!
I had the same problem with the Tamil script
(which also has complex Glyph rendering)
while making transcriptions of Tēvāram songs,
as in
"https://univ-paris-diderot.academia.edu/JeanLucChevillard/Musical-Transcription";
and finally concluded that it was hopeless for the tim
[about lilypond lyrics in Kannada script]
> I tried to use unicode fonts for the lyrics. While the fonts show
> perfectly well in the input file, the output is not correct. Is
> there a workaround?
This depends on
(a) whether the used Pango library version has support for Kannada,
and
13 matches
Mail list logo
