On 11/03/2014 08:09 AM, Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
On Mon, 3 Nov 2014, Bric wrote:
One particular, however: I would stay away from "Unity", and opt for
"GNOME" during installation. Someone could still correct me and
persuade me about the glory of Unity, but I have instinctively
disliked it from its inception, and am happily using the
"traditional" Gnome.
With "traditional" do you mean Gnome 2.x or the new Gnome 3.x +
Gnome-shell?
Just like Unity (which I have not tried yet) Gnome3/Gnome-shell can be
quite a shock if you are looking for a "traditional" desktop. I am
really happy with it now, but it did take some time to get used to.
There are other alternatives if you are looking for something more
"traditional". Linux = freedom of choice.
good point. I guess there was a big leap from 2 to 3. I am using 3.10.4
currently. The bigger differences though are internal, AFAICT; the
exterior of 3 doesn't seem that much different from 2.0. (And I did use
the word "traditional" in quotes, originally ;-)
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
