It is now working ABSOLUTELY BRILLIANTLY!
Thanks for all your help.
Craig
On Tue Feb 03 2015 at 11:15:18 AM Urs Liska wrote:
>
> Am 03.02.2015 um 01:55 schrieb Craig Dabelstein:
>
> Dear Urs,
>
> Thanks so much for your advice. I tried both methods you suggest and
> neither one worked, but th
Am 03.02.2015 um 01:55 schrieb Craig Dabelstein:
Dear Urs,
Thanks so much for your advice. I tried both methods you suggest and
neither one worked, but this did ...
Originally I had:
\include "../Notes/flute.ily"
\include "part-init.ily"
I reversed the order of these two lines and now it wo
Dear Urs,
Thanks so much for your advice. I tried both methods you suggest and
neither one worked, but this did ...
Originally I had:
\include "../Notes/flute.ily"
\include "part-init.ily"
I reversed the order of these two lines and now it works perfectly.
\include "part-init.ily"
\include "../N
Dear Urs,
Thanks so much for your advice. I tried both methods you suggest and
neither one worked, but this did ...
Originally I had
\include "part-init.ily"
\include "../Notes/flute.ily"
On Tue Feb 03 2015 at 9:51:03 AM Urs Liska wrote:
> Hi Craig,
>
> it's like I expected (and not related
Hi Craig,
it's like I expected (and not related to \anntoate):
Am 03.02.2015 um 00:00 schrieb Craig Dabelstein:
Hi Urs,
Here is a zip of the complete project. There are 2 issues:
[1] If I put "part-init.ily" and "score-init.ily" in the top-most
folder (the same folder as "main-init.ily"), li
Am 31.01.2015 um 18:23 schrieb Urs Liska:
Am 31. Januar 2015 18:14:23 MEZ, schrieb Craig Dabelstein
:
Urs,
Another question ... Is there a reason why "main.init.ily",
"part-init.ily"
and "score-init.ily" can't be in the same folder?
If I put "part" and "score" in a sub folder they can locat
Am 31. Januar 2015 18:14:23 MEZ, schrieb Craig Dabelstein
:
>Urs,
>
>Another question ... Is there a reason why "main.init.ily",
>"part-init.ily"
>and "score-init.ily" can't be in the same folder?
>
>If I put "part" and "score" in a sub folder they can locate "main" in
>the
>folder above, howeve
Urs,
Another question ... Is there a reason why "main.init.ily", "part-init.ily"
and "score-init.ily" can't be in the same folder?
If I put "part" and "score" in a sub folder they can locate "main" in the
folder above, however, if I put them all in the same folder I get "cannot
find file main-ini
Hi Urs,
I followed your advice re: file structure -- "main-init.ily" has annotate,
and "part.init.ily" and "score-init.ily" include "main.init.ily".
When engraving the score it all works perfectly, but when engraving a part,
it gives errors because it can't find "annotate".
Any ideas?
Craig
O
Am 31. Januar 2015 03:05:24 MEZ, schrieb Craig Dabelstein
:
>Thanks Urs,
>
>And you put the "\include annotate" code in the main-init.ily file?
>
Yes, and any similar code like the include of global-defs.ily etc. too.
Urs
>Craig
>
>
>On Sat Jan 31 2015 at 8:05:57 AM Urs Liska wrote:
>
>> Hi
Thanks Urs,
And you put the "\include annotate" code in the main-init.ily file?
Craig
On Sat Jan 31 2015 at 8:05:57 AM Urs Liska wrote:
> Hi Craig,
>
> Am 30.01.2015 um 17:59 schrieb Craig Dabelstein:
>
> Urs,
>
> Here is a zip of the complete project.
>
>
> Thank you, this was indeed instr
Hi Craig,
Am 30.01.2015 um 17:59 schrieb Craig Dabelstein:
Urs,
Here is a zip of the complete project.
Thank you, this was indeed instructive (and a nice score BTW).
There is an issue with your set-up which I had immediately noticed and
wanted to tell you about, even before I realized you h
Am 30.01.2015 um 08:16 schrieb Urs Liska:
Am 30.01.2015 um 08:13 schrieb Philippe Massart:
Probably not. I assume that hash hasn't been properly filtered. Could you
please post the generated .inp and maybe also the LilyPond file?
Urs
These are based on the sample file included :
Ah, OK.
Am 30.01.2015 um 09:35 schrieb Craig Dabelstein:
Hi Urs,
I put \include "scholarly/annotate.ily" in each of my 24 files -- one
for each instrument.
In the score I put:
\include "scholarly/annotate.ily"
\setAnnotationExportTargets #'("plaintext" "latex")
I added 1 criticalremark and 1 musica
Hi Urs,
I put \include "scholarly/annotate.ily" in each of my 24 files -- one for
each instrument.
In the score I put:
\include "scholarly/annotate.ily"
\setAnnotationExportTargets #'("plaintext" "latex")
I added 1 criticalremark and 1 musical issue to test it out.
The generated parts (both the
Am 30.01.2015 um 08:13 schrieb Philippe Massart:
Probably not. I assume that hash hasn't been properly filtered. Could you
please post the generated .inp and maybe also the LilyPond file?
Urs
These are based on the sample file included :
Ah, OK.
I see the offending LaTeX code, but I'll
>
> Probably not. I assume that hash hasn't been properly filtered. Could you
> please post the generated .inp and maybe also the LilyPond file?
>
> Urs
>
These are based on the sample file included :
annotate.annotations.inp
Description: Binary data
annotate.ly
Description: Binary dat
Am 30.01.2015 um 08:07 schrieb Philippe Massart:
Hello,
I’ tried the LaTeX package. Annotations are well included and it looks
promising. But the beginning of the file causes an error due to the
sharp symbol in the first part of the file (the part before the
\musicalissue )
Error:
(./annot
Hello,
I’ tried the LaTeX package. Annotations are well included and it looks
promising. But the beginning of the file causes an error due to the sharp
symbol in the first part of the file (the part before the \musicalissue )
Error:
(./annotate.annotations.inp
./annotate.annotations.inp:1: You
Dear Craig,
thank you for the report.
Am 30.01.2015 um 03:28 schrieb Craig Dabelstein:
Dear Urs,
I incorporated annotate into one of my current scores and it is
fantastic.
Great. Just to let me know: did you experience any troubles or is it as
simple as I think to get it to run?
I can'
Dear Urs,
I incorporated annotate into one of my current scores and it is fantastic.
I can't wait for the Latex package to go along with it.
Thanks for all you hard work.
Craig
On Wed Jan 28 2015 at 8:35:07 PM Noeck wrote:
> > I hope my other reply is a sufficient answer to this?
>
> Yes, of
> I hope my other reply is a sufficient answer to this?
Yes, of course (and I agree).
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Am 28.01.2015 um 11:11 schrieb Noeck:
why we use so many discrete projects and repositories
I would like to second this. I am much more likely to check things out (and
perhaps contribute to things) that are in the openlilylib snippets as this is
the only repo I have checked out besides the lily
Hi Samuel,
thanks for your thoughts. They are not offending at all but express
valid concerns.
However, I think there are good reasons to go the way I (and others) are
going.
All these things have to be seen in the context of an idea/project you
can't know yet - "specifications" for a common
> why we use so many discrete projects and repositories
I would like to second this. I am much more likely to check things out (and
perhaps contribute to things) that are in the openlilylib snippets as this is
the only repo I have checked out besides the lilypond git. All other repos would
be an e
Dear Urs,
Bravo! This is excellent work. I really appreciate all the time and effort
you put into Lilypond.
Craig
maximesmusic.com
On Wed Jan 28 2015 at 9:58:13 AM tyronicus wrote:
> I must immediately excuse myself for not reading the blog post first and
> seeing that ScholarLY is a part of
I must immediately excuse myself for not reading the blog post first and
seeing that ScholarLY is a part of openlilylib. But I still wonder about the
rest.
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/ScholarLY-introduction-and-call-for-collaboration-tp171140p171152.ht
I am all in favor of the collaboration, but I wonder if I might
pessimistically ask why we use so many discrete projects and repositories.
It seems to me that we could accomplish much more by using one git project
instead of having openlilylib, the LSR, and our newest projects, ScholarLY
and GASP.
28 matches
Mail list logo
