I am all in favor of the collaboration, but I wonder if I might pessimistically ask why we use so many discrete projects and repositories.
It seems to me that we could accomplish much more by using one git project instead of having openlilylib, the LSR, and our newest projects, ScholarLY and GASP. On top of all these projects, I've noticed that a few LP users have their own repos of snippets and tools. Wouldn't the beginning to intermediate user of LilyPond be benefited by the ability to find all of these resources under one roof? Even the advanced user might more willingly contribute to the various projects if they were all right there in front of him/her. Assuming it is an idea of the different projects having separate 'missions,' why not broaden our horizons? I hope I haven't angered anyone who fills differently than I do. These are just the thoughts of an admitted beginner. -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/ScholarLY-introduction-and-call-for-collaboration-tp171140p171149.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
