On Wed, May 28, 2008 10:51 am, Peter Johnson wrote:
>
> Yes - just remove or comment out the second \partial 16 instruction.
> Barlines, repeats, and accidentals all look right. Remember, a repeat mark
> is not a barline. Here's the new snippet code.
OK, I've give it a try in the non-snippet cod
On Wed, May 28, 2008 10:51 am, Peter Johnson wrote:
>
> Yes - just remove or comment out the second \partial 16 instruction.
> Barlines, repeats, and accidentals all look right. Remember, a repeat mark
> is not a barline. Here's the new snippet code.
OK, Peter - I will try it tonight and report
Yes - just remove or comment out the second \partial 16 instruction.
Barlines, repeats, and accidentals all look right. Remember, a repeat mark
is not a barline. Here's the new snippet code.
#(set-default-paper-size "letter")
#(set-global-staff-size 19)
\header {
title = "Sharp now pre
On Wed, May 28, 2008 9:54 am, Peter Johnson wrote:
>
> Griff,
>
> The f#16 at the start of the second passage is not a partial: remove this
> command and it's OK. Looks like with \partial the d# is (incorrectly?)
> carried over from the previous uncompleted bar.
Thanks for replying, Peter. I'm no
Griff,
The f#16 at the start of the second passage is not a partial: remove this
command and it's OK. Looks like with \partial the d# is (incorrectly?)
carried over from the previous uncompleted bar.
Peter
Bugzilla from [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I have cut down the piece I am transcribing
