Hello, Jan.
The article you pointed out earlier, by J-P Coulon, was more useful than
anything I could find.
The handbook from the Music Publishers Association of the United States, by
contrast, has some mistakes -- such as putting the key cancellation /after/ the
new key signature; we in the
user@gnu.org
Sent: Saturday, December 18, 2010 2:18 PM
Subject: Re: Odd output
Thanks Phil, I'm curious about the vocal part. Why is the stemming different
than the piano reduction? As written, it indicates SAA division on the first
chord and SSS (no Alto!) on the second. This may
gt; To: "James Lowe"
> Cc: "Keith OHara" ;
> Sent: Friday, December 17, 2010 11:37 PM
> Subject: Re: Odd output
>
>
> On 17 December 2010 23:09, James Lowe wrote:
>
> I am not a vocal specialist but just using this one simplistic example of
>>
- Original Message -
From: "Neil Puttock"
To: "James Lowe"
Cc: "Keith OHara" ;
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2010 11:37 PM
Subject: Re: Odd output
On 17 December 2010 23:09, James Lowe wrote:
I am not a vocal specialist but just using this one simplistic
- Original Message -
From: "Keith OHara"
To: ; "Phil Holmes"
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2010 9:43 PM
Subject: Re: Odd output
On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 04:09:10 -0800, Phil Holmes
wrote:
The version that Chappell uses in the Mikado is attached.
Nice.
It does b
On 17 December 2010 23:09, James Lowe wrote:
> I am not a vocal specialist but just using this one simplistic example of C
> seems erroneous. Isn't the idea of the notes printed at the same moment to
> show that they need to be sung at the same moment if you see what I mean? Yes
> I am sure th
>
> -Original Message-
> From: lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org on behalf of
> Michael Ellis
> Sent: Fri 12/17/2010 21:50
> To: Keith OHara
> Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
> Subject: Re: Odd output
>
> +1 for option C
> Cheers,
> Mike
>
>
>
Hello,
-Original Message-
From: lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org on behalf of
Michael Ellis
Sent: Fri 12/17/2010 21:50
To: Keith OHara
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Odd output
+1 for option C
Cheers,
Mike
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Keith OHara
+1 for option C
Cheers,
Mike
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Keith OHara wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 04:09:10 -0800, Phil Holmes
> wrote:
>
>>
>> The version that Chappell uses in the Mikado is attached.
>>
>> Nice.
> It does break the usual rules about horizontal placement, and about when
On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 04:09:10 -0800, Phil Holmes wrote:
The version that Chappell uses in the Mikado is attached.
Nice.
It does break the usual rules about horizontal placement, and about when to
cancel accidentals in another voice. But, with the beaming to clarify the
timing and linking the
- Original Message -
From: "Keith OHara"
To:
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2010 9:33 AM
Subject: Re: Odd output
Phil Holmes philholmes.net> writes:
From: "Marco Correia" gmail.com>
>
> \include "english.ly"
> {
> \clef treble
> \t
Phil Holmes philholmes.net> writes:
>
> From: "Marco Correia" gmail.com>
> >
> > \include "english.ly"
> > {
> > \clef treble
> > \time 4/4
> > <<
> > { fs'4 }
> > \\
> > { f'4 } >>
> >>>
>
> This was one of the first issues I raised, in June this year. I think it
> was my first bug report:
>
On 12/10/10 8:27 PM, "Marco Correia" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I didn't want to sound rude or anything. I just want to make a point that I do
> not consider this as a minor improvement since:
>
> 1. The output is not aestetically wrong, it is definitely readable differently
> from what is specified i
ginal Message -
> From: "Marco Correia"
> To: "Phil Holmes"
> Sent: Friday, December 10, 2010 10:29 AM
> Subject: Re: Odd output
>
> > Thanks!
> >
> > I can't believe that this is seen as a low priority enhancement...! This
>
Michael Ellis writes:
> Yes! Spelling does count because poorly spelled music is much harder
> to read. I'm somewhat less convinced regarding sonic differences on
> untempered instruments because the matter is more complicated than
> that, e.g G# as the leading tone to A is different from G# as t
>> I made a workaround with a combination of forcing the accidentals to be
>> displayed, and then using force-hshift and extra-offset and a few other
>> tweaks to make it work.
>>
>> My example is pretty complicated, because I also autogenerate the code, but
example is pretty complicated, because I also autogenerate the code,
>> but you're welcome to a copy if you want.
>>
>> --
>> Phil Holmes
>>
>>
>>
>> - Original Message - From: "Marco Correia" <
>> marco.v.corr...
could but shouldn't
> use a Gb not a F# as the first chordsis a G chord."
>
> Note his final comment - could use a Gb but shouldn't.
>
> --
> Phil Holmes
>
>
>
> - Original Message -----
> *From:* Michael Ellis
> *To:* LilyPond User Group
> *S
togenerate the code, but
> you're welcome to a copy if you want.
>
> --
> Phil Holmes
>
>
>
> - Original Message - From: "Marco Correia"
> To: "Phil Holmes"
> Sent: Friday, December 10, 2010 10:29 AM
> Subject: Re: Odd output
>
Sent: Friday, December 10, 2010 5:18 PM
Subject: Re: Odd output
Why not set one of the notes to a different enharmonic pitch? It's certainly
much kinder to the musician who's trying to play the composition.
\include "english.ly"
{
\clef tre
c:
Sent: Friday, December 10, 2010 3:18 AM
Subject: Re: Odd output
You get 2 stems because you created 2 voices with the signs "<<" and \\
see
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/Documentation/user/lilypond/Multiple-voices.html
What are you trying to compose?
On Dec 9, 2010, at 7
>
> --
> Phil Holmes
>
>
>
> - Original Message - From: "Marco Correia" <
> marco.v.corr...@gmail.com>
> To: "Phil Holmes"
> Sent: Friday, December 10, 2010 10:29 AM
> Subject: Re: Odd output
>
>
> Thanks!
>>
>> I
uot;Phil Holmes"
Sent: Friday, December 10, 2010 10:29 AM
Subject: Re: Odd output
Thanks!
I can't believe that this is seen as a low priority enhancement...! This
completely renders lilypond unusable for the task I need it, which is to
serve
as a printer for computer generated music. Th
Thanks!
I can't believe that this is seen as a low priority enhancement...! This
completely renders lilypond unusable for the task I need it, which is to serve
as a printer for computer generated music. The output is not ugly - it is
plain wrong!
Why doesn't the accidental_engraver looks into
You get 2 stems because you created 2 voices with the signs "<<" and \\
see
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/Documentation/user/lilypond/Multiple-voices.html
What are you trying to compose?
On Dec 9, 2010, at 7:35 PM, Marco Correia wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just started using lilypond, so it is very p
Isn't there a >> missing to pair with the << ?
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
- Original Message -
From: "Marco Correia"
To:
Sent: Friday, December 10, 2010 12:35 AM
Subject: Odd output
Hi,
I just started using lilypond, so it is very possible that I'm making some
mistake.
When compiling this example:
\include "english.ly"
{
\clef treble
\time 4/4
<<
{ fs'4
Hello
-Original Message-
From: lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org on behalf of Marco
Correia
Sent: Fri 12/10/2010 0:35
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Odd output
Hi,
I just started using lilypond, so it is very possible that I'm making some
mistake.
When compil
28 matches
Mail list logo
