Thanks!
I can't believe that this is seen as a low priority enhancement...! This
completely renders lilypond unusable for the task I need it, which is to serve
as a printer for computer generated music. The output is not ugly - it is
plain wrong!
Why doesn't the accidental_engraver looks into other voices as well?
Maybe I can workaround it by doing an extra pass before writing the lilypond
code to check if this kind of problem may occur... But now I wonder what other
kind of potential problems may occur with this accidental_engraver
algorithm...
Anyway, I just wanted to say that I think this problem deserves more
consideration.
Thank you!
Marco
On Friday 10 December 2010, you wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Marco Correia" <marco.v.corr...@gmail.com>
> To: <lilypond-user@gnu.org>
> Sent: Friday, December 10, 2010 12:35 AM
> Subject: Odd output
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just started using lilypond, so it is very possible that I'm making
> > some mistake.
> >
> > When compiling this example:
> >
> > \include "english.ly"
> > {
> > \clef treble
> > \time 4/4
> > <<
> > { fs'4 }
> > \\
> > { f'4 }
> >
> > }
> >
> > I see two notes on fs (occupying the same position but with stems up and
> > down). There is no indication that f is there.
> >
> > Is this supposed to/ how do I fix it?
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Marco
>
> This was one of the first issues I raised, in June this year. I think it
> was my first bug report:
>
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1134
>
>
> --
> Phil Holmes
--
Marco Correia <m...@netcabo.pt>
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
