Re: Impossible or ambiguous (de)crescendo in MIDI.

2016-03-18 Thread Graham King
On Wed, 2016-03-02 at 14:37 +, Graham King wrote: > I'm trying to eradicate numerous "Impossible or ambiguous > (de)crescendo in MIDI" errors from a large score... Well, there's some, qualified, success to report: I've eliminated the various, sometimes well-hidden, causes of these messages.

Re: Impossible or ambiguous (de)crescendo in MIDI.

2016-03-18 Thread Richard Shann
On Thu, 2016-03-17 at 22:51 +, Graham King wrote: > On Wed, 2016-03-02 at 14:37 +, Graham King wrote: > > I'm trying to eradicate numerous "Impossible or ambiguous > > (de)crescendo in MIDI" errors from a large score... > Well, there's some, qualified, success to report: I've eliminated the

Re: Impossible or ambiguous (de)crescendo in MIDI.

2016-03-18 Thread Simon Albrecht
Hello Graham, On 17.03.2016 23:51, Graham King wrote: # { c_\markup { \dynamic p \italic { dolce } } Looks like a dynamic, walks like a dynamic, but doesn't quack like one. Replace with { c-\omit\p_\markup { \dynamic p \italic { dolce } } Likewise for "meno f" and many other cases. # { c1\sf

Re: Impossible or ambiguous (de)crescendo in MIDI.

2016-03-18 Thread Graham King
On Fri, 2016-03-18 at 00:13 +0100, Simon Albrecht wrote: > Hello Graham, > > On 17.03.2016 23:51, Graham King wrote: > > # { c_\markup { \dynamic p \italic { dolce } } Looks like a dynamic, > > walks like a dynamic, but doesn't quack like one. Replace with { > > c-\omit\p_\markup { \dynamic p

Re: Impossible or ambiguous (de)crescendo in MIDI

2016-03-06 Thread Simon Albrecht
On 05.03.2016 01:04, Graham King wrote: On Fri, 2016-03-04 at 13:33 -0600, Cynthia Karl wrote: > I think I understand why these errors are generated. It would appear that \fz is not intended to be used as a dynamic - it is not mentioned in the NR. Nevertheless, is is defined as a dynamic scr

Re: Impossible or ambiguous (de)crescendo in MIDI

2016-03-04 Thread Graham King
On Fri, 2016-03-04 at 13:33 -0600, Cynthia Karl wrote: > > > > I think I understand why these errors are generated. It would appear that > \fz is not intended to be used as a dynamic - it is not mentioned in the NR. > Nevertheless, is is defined as a dynamic script in the LP file > dynamic-

Re: Impossible or ambiguous (de)crescendo in MIDI

2016-03-04 Thread Cynthia Karl
> Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2016 14:37:44 + > From: Graham King > To: LilyPond Users > Subject: Impossible or ambiguous (de)crescendo in MIDI. > Message-ID: <1456929464.11804.791.ca...@oberon.tremagi.org.uk> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-asciiā€ > > 2) The second problem arose when I fin

Re: Impossible or ambiguous (de)crescendo in MIDI.

2016-03-02 Thread Simon Albrecht
On 02.03.2016 21:21, Graham King wrote: On Wed, 2016-03-02 at 14:37 +, Graham King wrote: Is there a magic spell to soothe lilypond in these circumstances? It might seem like nit-picking, but there are so many of these errors in the score that they are obscuring other, more important, mess

Re: Impossible or ambiguous (de)crescendo in MIDI.

2016-03-02 Thread Graham King
On Wed, 2016-03-02 at 14:37 +, Graham King wrote: > Is there a magic spell to soothe lilypond in these circumstances? It > might seem like nit-picking, but there are so many of these errors in > the score that they are obscuring other, more important, messages. Brian Barker has kindly answer

Re: Impossible or ambiguous (de)crescendo in MIDI

2014-05-31 Thread Knute Snortum
I just noticed the last line of your post. Yes, a line number to the source would be nice. I don't know if this issue ever got into issue tracking for LilyPond. This comment should be added if it did. Knute Snortum (via Gmail) On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 6:55 AM, Knute Snortum wrote: > This wa

Re: Impossible or ambiguous (de)crescendo in MIDI

2014-05-31 Thread Knute Snortum
This was discussed here: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/MIDI-dynamics-parsing-error-tt162479.html#a162546 The long and the short of it was to put a dynamic mark in, like \mf, and then \omit the text. There was some agreement that LilyPond should assume a dynamic of mf or handle this bette