On Fri, 2016-03-18 at 00:13 +0100, Simon Albrecht wrote:
> Hello Graham,
>
> On 17.03.2016 23:51, Graham King wrote:
> > # { c_\markup { \dynamic p \italic { dolce } } Looks like a dynamic,
> > walks like a dynamic, but doesn't quack like one. Replace with {
> > c-\omit\p_\markup { \dynamic p \italic { dolce } } Likewise for "meno
> > f" and many other cases.
> > # { c1\sfz } No this is not a dynamic, either. Try:{ \tag #'pdf {
> > c1\sfz } \tag #'midi { c4->\f ~ c2.\mf } } [note 1]
>
> (the numbering renders quite badly now… this was nos. 5 & 6)
>
> I have a stylesheet called ‘dynamic-custom.ily’, which is \included into
> ‘standard-include.ily’, which I \include in virtually all my projects.
> It contains a bunch of lines like:
>
> pDolce = #(make-dynamic-script (markup "p" #:normal-text #:italic "dolce"))
>
> [equivalent to
> pDolce = #(make-dynamic-script #{ \markup { p \normal-text \italic dolce
> } #})
> ]
>
> \pDolce now creates a DynamicText grob instead of a TextScript grob,
> which is crucial, since only the former affects MIDI.
> I guess you might do something similar for ‘sfz’, but without getting a
> proper rendition in sound, of course.
>
> HTH, Simon
thanks Simon. That looks very neat, and confers the additional
advantage of enforcing some stylistic consistency. I'll investigate
further.
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
