Re: GDP: NR 3

2008-07-18 Thread Trevor Daniels
Graham Percival wrote Friday, July 18, 2008 1:28 AM On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 11:10:11 +0100 "Trevor Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Graham Percival wrote Thursday, July 17, 2008 9:37 AM > I think 3.5.7 is unnecessary. Just add ", in any MIDI player which > supports pitch bending" to the item i

Re: GDP: NR 3

2008-07-17 Thread Graham Percival
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 11:10:11 +0100 "Trevor Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Graham Percival wrote Thursday, July 17, 2008 9:37 AM > > I think 3.5.7 is unnecessary. Just add ", in any MIDI player which > > supports pitch bending" to the item in 3.5.2. > > I included this because the only men

Re: GDP: NR 3

2008-07-17 Thread Trevor Daniels
Thanks for the quick response! Graham Percival wrote Thursday, July 17, 2008 9:37 AM On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 09:17:31 +0100 "Trevor Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: NR 3.5 MIDI output I think 3.5.7 is unnecessary. Just add ", in any MIDI player which supports pitch bending" to the item in 3

Re: GDP: NR 3

2008-07-17 Thread Graham Percival
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 09:17:31 +0100 "Trevor Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > NR 3.5 MIDI output I think 3.5.7 is unnecessary. Just add ", in any MIDI player which supports pitch bending" to the item in 3.5.2. I'm not certain if we need a separate subsubsection for instrument names. Why not