Re: Feature request - extended ties

2005-02-21 Thread David Raleigh Arnold
On Sunday 20 February 2005 10:07 am, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > Han-Wen, all-- > I understand what you need, and I'll look into it. I only know this > notation from grace notes writing out an arpeggiated chord. Do you > know whether it is also used without grace notes

Re: Feature request - extended ties, addendum

2005-02-20 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > >In current CVS, we have > > > > \set tieWaitForNote = ##t > > \grace { c16[~ e~ g]~ } 4 > > > >By toggling tieWaitForNote where necessary, you can get any of the > >things you need. > > > >If there is sufficient interest, I will do a backport to 2.4, once

Re: Feature request - extended ties, addendum

2005-02-20 Thread Steve D
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Using this hypothetical construct: \extendTies { c16~ e~ g~ } 4 It would be nice if the block that contains the notes the ties of which should be extended, were to be able to arbitrarily contain any of the following in addition to regular notes

Re: Feature request - extended ties, addendum

2005-02-20 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Using this hypothetical construct: > > \extendTies { c16~ e~ g~ } 4 > > It would be nice if the block that contains the notes the ties of > which should be extended, were to be able to arbitrarily contain > any of the following in addition to regular notes as shown

Re: Feature request - extended ties

2005-02-20 Thread Chris Sawer
On 20 Feb 2005, at 15:07, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: [...] I understand what you need, and I'll look into it. I only know this notation from grace notes writing out an arpeggiated chord. Do you know whether it is also used without grace notes (ie. with the 16th notes being normal rhythmic notes?) Yes,

Re: Feature request - extended ties, addendum

2005-02-20 Thread Steve D
Hello Han-Wen, all-- Han-Wen, if you do decide to consider my previously mentioned feature request (if it seems like a worthy feature and feasible to you in terms of coding complexity, and worthy of your time when I'm sure there are many things that vie for your attention), I guess I ought to a