"trevordi...@gmail.com"
>Cc: lilypond-usermailinglist
>Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2012 2:59:50 PM
>Subject: Re: Experimental Web-based Lilypond Editor
>
>
>Hi, Trevor,
>
>
>
>I just want to follow up with the midi file available for download same as the
>pd
Hi, Trevor:
There is "\midi { }' in your sample .ly on lilybin.com (lilybin editor). How
can I save this midi file the same as to save pdf output?
Blessing in+,
Ming.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/
ok, i haven´t had this connection to pastebin. so, lilybin is a very good name!
Am Wed, 8 Feb 2012 18:49:33 +0100
schrieb Nils :
> Yes, Lilybin is a good name. The connection to pastebin was clear to me.
>
> Nils
>
> On Wed, 8 Feb 2012 09:44:43 -0800 (PST)
> trevordixon wrote:
>
> >
> > Hah
Markus W. Kropp wrote:
> What a pity! No Wuala.
I'm not sure I could ever use a service whose name was based on a
mispronounced word.
--
Tim Roberts, t...@probo.com
Providenza & Boekelheide, Inc.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
h
Yes, Lilybin is a good name. The connection to pastebin was clear to me.
Nils
On Wed, 8 Feb 2012 09:44:43 -0800 (PST)
trevordixon wrote:
>
> Haha! More like JSBin.com or PasteBin.com.
>
> Well, I already bought LilyBin.com, so that's the name! It's short and easy
> to remember, and will hopef
Haha! More like JSBin.com or PasteBin.com.
Well, I already bought LilyBin.com, so that's the name! It's short and easy
to remember, and will hopefully encourage frequent casual use as an easy way
to share LilyPond snippets, even if people don't use it as their main
editor.
Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> Its new name is LilyBin. Is that a great name?
Hmm. Is this a dustbin for lilies?
Werner
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
What a pity! No Wuala.
Well, what´s about the name "LilyWeb" or "WebLily"? This means more, what this
nice software stands for.
Am Wed, 8 Feb 2012 09:28:21 -0800 (PST)
schrieb trevordixon :
>
> Wuala integration is impossible at this time, because their API is read-only.
> Wuala gives develop
Wuala integration is impossible at this time, because their API is read-only.
Wuala gives developers no way of writing files.
Its new name is LilyBin. Is that a great name?
Markus W. Kropp wrote:
>
>> First round of Dropbox integration launched,
>
> What about the integration of wuala? i think
> First round of Dropbox integration launched,
What about the integration of wuala? i think it´s better than dropbox or a good
alternative.
link:
http://www.wuala.com/de/ (german)
http://www.wuala.com/en/ (english)
great software, you wrote! and: please give it a name.
musix
Am Tue, 7 Feb
First round of Dropbox integration launched, but it won't let anybody log in
until Dropbox approves the app for production mode.
trevordixon wrote:
>
>
I've been working on something I think the LilyPond community may find very
useful: a web-based editor. Before you check it out, keep in mind t
[Thanks to Dean Herington for the translation]
Hello,
I've tried in vain to write my message in
English, but given the difficulty I've had, I'm
posting in French, hoping that someone will post
it to the English-speaking list...
We could discuss it here [on the French-speaking
list], but there's
Oh..sorry..now i saw it..CTRL+Enter(Return)..Thanks..
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 9:25 PM, Stjepan Horvat wrote:
> Is there a possibility of adding a keyboard shortcut for preview to the
> page..I was writing something and when i wanted to compile the thing a
> pressed "F5" and that refreshed the pag
Is there a possibility of adding a keyboard shortcut for preview to the
page..I was writing something and when i wanted to compile the thing a
pressed "F5" and that refreshed the page and i was on the begining..:) that
happend couple of times (frustrating) (i used vim for a while)..:P
On Sat, Feb
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 9:52 AM, James wrote:
> Frescobaldi has a heap more useful features though for serious use than this
> experimental website - that's not to disparage what is done here, it's a nice
> piece of work.
>
> The Implication that Mr Kulp made was basically not having to keep open
On Sat, 4 Feb 2012 15:52:27 +
James wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 4 Feb 2012, at 12:42, Nils wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 4 Feb 2012 06:05:10 +
> > James wrote:
> >
> >> Hello
> >>
> ?
>
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Jonathan Kulp
> wrote:
>
> > Completely Awesom
Hello,
On 4 Feb 2012, at 12:42, Nils wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Feb 2012 06:05:10 +
> James wrote:
>
>> Hello
>>
?
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Jonathan Kulp
wrote:
> Completely Awesome! I'm going to show this to my students. They'll
> find this much easier t
On Sat, 4 Feb 2012 06:05:10 +
James wrote:
> Hello
>
> >> ?
> >>
> >> On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Jonathan Kulp
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Completely Awesome! I'm going to show this to my students. They'll
> >>> find this much easier than trying to deal with a separate editor,
> >>> openin
ming tsang wrote:
>
> This works fine in firefox 10.0
>
> I am looking forward to the future feature as mention in your
> email.
>
> Can you also include midi output?
>
> Good for singing practice
>
>
>
> See it at: http://lily.sytes.net http://lily.sytes.net
>
>
>
--
View this mes
Hello
>> ?
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Jonathan Kulp
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Completely Awesome! I'm going to show this to my students. They'll
>>> find this much easier than trying to deal with a separate editor,
>>> opening pdf reader, etc. Thanks for sharing!
Frescobaldi?
James
like others to look at and mess with.
>> > Quick projects when you don't have access to your regular development
>> > environment.
>> > Perhaps as your main editor someday.
>> >
>> > Future features might include:
>> >
>> > Ability to open and save to your hard drive.
>
> > Quick projects when you don't have access to your regular development
> > environment.
> > Perhaps as your main editor someday.
> >
> > Future features might include:
> >
> > Ability to open and save to your hard drive.
> > Ability to ope
t; Quick projects when you don't have access to your regular development
> environment.
> Perhaps as your main editor someday.
>
> Future features might include:
>
> Ability to open and save to your hard drive.
> Ability to open and save to Dropbox.
> Open to suggestions.
stions.
See it at: http://lily.sytes.net
Let me know how it works for you!
--------
View this message in context: Re: Experimental Web-based Lilypond
Editor
<http://old.nabble.com/Experimental-Web-based-Lilypond-Editor-tp3324
Actually, I think the truly surprising thing is that it
works so well in almost all contexts that have been
reported so far!
Much kudos to Trevor.
Rgds, GFStC.
On Fri, 3 Feb 2012 19:28:16 +
James wrote:
On 3 February 2012 19:01, GRAEME F ST CLAIR
wrote:
Odd result here - I use a brow
On 3-2-2012 20:01, GRAEME F ST CLAIR wrote:
Odd result here - I use a browser-based e-mail system (for
the moment), and clicking on Stan's link produces a new
tab in IE 9.0.4, but with no content. Cutting & pasting the link into
a separate Chrome works fine.
Also when accessing the e-mail sys
On 3 February 2012 19:01, GRAEME F ST CLAIR
wrote:
> Odd result here - I use a browser-based e-mail system (for
> the moment), and clicking on Stan's link produces a new
> tab in IE 9.0.4, but with no content. Cutting & pasting the link into a
> separate Chrome works fine.
>
> Also when accessing
Odd result here - I use a browser-based e-mail system (for
the moment), and clicking on Stan's link produces a new
tab in IE 9.0.4, but with no content. Cutting & pasting
the link into a separate Chrome works fine.
Also when accessing the e-mail system via Chrome, clicking
on the link works f
Way-hay awesome. Firefox 4, works great...
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 7:47 AM, Stan Sanderson wrote:
> On Feb 3, 2012, at 7:28 AM, Kieren MacMillan
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> This is a pretty amazing prototype! Congratulations and thanks to all
>> involved.
>> Has anyone tested this on an iPad o
On Feb 3, 2012, at 7:28 AM, Kieren MacMillan
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a pretty amazing prototype! Congratulations and thanks to all
> involved.
> Has anyone tested this on an iPad or other tablet? Just curious.
>
> Cheers,
> Kieren.
> ___
> lily
-Eluze wrote:
>
>
> does not work with opera 11.61 on windows(7), though
>
> Eluze
>
now it seems to work on Opera but a bit buggish: code starts only at col
~80, after inserting a newline line numbers moved to the right (see attached
file).
would be nice if these little things could be fix
It works on an iPhone, so I guess it also will on an iPad. On an iPhone
it's no fun using it, really. And a problem is that I don't see a way
(yet) how to save the source file (except by copy-pasting into a mail
body) or download the pdf - that could be the same issue on an iPad,
given Apple's iOS
On Feb 3, 2012 2:29 PM, "Kieren MacMillan"
wrote:
> Has anyone tested this on an iPad or other tablet? Just curious.
Works on my Adam w/ Adamcomb rom.
Christ van Willegen
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailm
Hi all,
This is a pretty amazing prototype! Congratulations and thanks to all involved.
Has anyone tested this on an iPad or other tablet? Just curious.
Cheers,
Kieren.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/l
works on my debian-squeeze with iceweasel 3.5.16 (with a very short testing
time). very nice tool!!!
Am Wed, 1 Feb 2012 11:06:06 +0100
schrieb Nils :
> Very good!
>
> I think this will benefit many people. I always wanted to quickly share some
> notes with other people.
> Like pastebin.com f
Now allows for compiling with either the latest stable version or latest
unstable version. Click the arrow next to the preview button to choose the
version.
trevordixon wrote:
>
>
I've been working on something I think the LilyPond community may find very
useful: a web-based editor. Before you
Maybe it would be a cool feature if you could import saved file as a
config..maybe http://lily.sytes.net/configfile.ly..i don't know if this
would be possible..just an idea..
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 9:50 PM, Stjepan Horvat wrote:
> This is very good..! I like it..I was searching for something lik
This is very good..! I like it..I was searching for something like this for
days back..
I tryed it with jumnji-git and it works perfect..!
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Stefan Vollmar wrote:
> It works very well with Safari 5.1.2 on the Mac, great stuff!
> Warm regards,
> Stefan
>
> On 01.
It works very well with Safari 5.1.2 on the Mac, great stuff!
Warm regards,
Stefan
On 01.02.2012, at 10:51, trevordixon wrote:
> I've been working on something I think the LilyPond community may find very
> useful: a web-based editor. Before you check it out, keep in mind that it's
> at a pre-
2012/2/1 trevordixon :
> I've been working on something I think the LilyPond community may find very
> useful: a web-based editor. Before you check it out, keep in mind that it's
> at a pre-alpha stage. It's likely that certain things won't work as
> expected, and it will probably crash and be down
There shouldn't be any firewall issues anymore. Give it another try!
Helge Kruse-3 wrote:
>
> 2012/2/1 trevordixon :
>> expected, and it will probably crash and be down at times. I've only
>> tested
>> it in Chrome 15 and Firefox 9. It should work in Internet Explorer 9 or
>> 10,
>> but will alm
Good to know! Thanks for the feedback. Also, I think I've fixed it so you
shouldn't have any firewall issues anymore. Give it another try.
Trevor
Jan Terje Augestad wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> A web-based editor is GREAT! I've wanted a web-based notation software for
> a years, and this is really perf
look at this
http://www.scorio.com/de/web/scorio/
it´s webbased, too, but not as good as lilypond. lilypond rules!
greets, musix
Am Wed, 01 Feb 2012 23:38:32 +0100
schrieb Jan Terje Augestad :
> Hi,
>
> A web-based editor is GREAT! I've wanted a web-based notation software for a
> years, an
Hi,
A web-based editor is GREAT! I've wanted a web-based notation software for a
years, and this is really perfect. This would definitely be my main editor if
it met the following (very few) criteria:
* Use of the latest stable release
* Ability to open and save to hard drive or Dropbox (if you
Am 01.02.2012 11:45, schrieb Marc Hohl:
Am 01.02.2012 11:18, schrieb trevordixon:
Yes, I will upgrade it. 2.12 is what's in Ubuntu's repository, but I
think an
upgrade to 2.14 will be trivial. I'll do that soon. Will it almost
always be
desirable to use the latest LilyPond release, or would it
Am 01.02.2012 20:03, schrieb Trevor:
Yes, it's very likely your firewall is crippling it. I'll see if I can
tweak some things to make it work from behind a firewall.
Ah. I see, you use TCP connections to port 3001 to communicate with
"socket.io". If this is a fixed port, I could talk with our
trevordixon wrote:
>
> I've been working on something I think the LilyPond community may find
> very useful: a web-based editor. Before you check it out, keep in mind
> that it's at a pre-alpha stage. It's likely that certain things won't work
> as expected, and it will probably crash and be dow
> Message: 7
> Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 12:51:18 -0600
> From: Stan Sanderson
> To: trevordixon
> Cc: "lilypond-user@gnu.org"
> Subject: Re: Experimental Web-based Lilypond Editor
> Message-ID: <5baa1542-e5b8-497f-b717-b861edaa5...@gmail.com>
> Content-Type
Yes, it's very likely your firewall is crippling it. I'll see if I can
tweak some things to make it work from behind a firewall.
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 4:53 AM, Helge Kruse wrote:
> >> Let me know how it works for you!
> >>
> > It doesn't work here. I tried Internet Explorer 9.0 and Firefox Porta
I installed tex-gyre on the server. Now does it use the right font?
Xavier Scheuer wrote:
>
> On 1 February 2012 11:08, Nils wrote:
>> Just tested it. Good work, again.
>
> Yeah, great work.
> Is this web-based Lily editor a free software too? It would be nice
> if we would be able to install
Now upgraded to 2.14.2.
flup2 wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> It works fine for me (using Chrome and Safari).
>
> Do you plan to update lilypond engine to the last stable release (2.14) ?
>
> I also tried weblily.net that's unfortunately stuck with 2.12.
>
> Philippe
>
--
View this message in cont
On Feb 1, 2012, at 5:32 AM, Helge Kruse wrote:
> 2012/2/1 trevordixon :
> expected, and it will probably crash and be down at times. I've only tested
> it in Chrome 15 and Firefox 9. It should work in Internet Explorer 9 or 10,
> but will almost certainly not work in IE8 or earlier.
>
>
> Let m
2012/2/1 trevordixon :
> expected, and it will probably crash and be down at times. I've only tested
> it in Chrome 15 and Firefox 9. It should work in Internet Explorer 9 or 10,
> but will almost certainly not work in IE8 or earlier.
>
> Let me know how it works for you!
>
It doesn't work here. I
>> Let me know how it works for you!
>>
> It doesn't work here. I tried Internet Explorer 9.0 and Firefox Portable 7.0.
>
> I see on the right pane no PDF. When I click on Preview, Save, or
> Download PDF nothing happens. I am behind a firewall. Can this affect
> the experience?
Just installed Fir
On 1 February 2012 11:08, Nils wrote:
> Just tested it. Good work, again.
Yeah, great work.
Is this web-based Lily editor a free software too? It would be nice
if we would be able to install it for instance on our own server.
> It even accepted the font change.
>
> http://lily.sytes.net/keorwxc
Am 01.02.2012 11:18, schrieb trevordixon:
Yes, I will upgrade it. 2.12 is what's in Ubuntu's repository, but I think an
upgrade to 2.14 will be trivial. I'll do that soon. Will it almost always be
desirable to use the latest LilyPond release, or would it benefit a lot of
people to be able to choo
On Feb 1, 2012, at 10:51 AM, trevordixon wrote:
> Let me know how it works for you!
>
Excellent work.
I'll pass it on to the French users list.
Cheers,
MS___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilyp
Yes, I will upgrade it. 2.12 is what's in Ubuntu's repository, but I think an
upgrade to 2.14 will be trivial. I'll do that soon. Will it almost always be
desirable to use the latest LilyPond release, or would it benefit a lot of
people to be able to choose from multiple versions of LilyPond?
fl
Hello,
It works fine for me (using Chrome and Safari).
Do you plan to update lilypond engine to the last stable release (2.14) ?
I also tried weblily.net that's unfortunately stuck with 2.12.
Philippe
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Experimental-Web-based-Lilypond-Edi
Just tested it. Good work, again.
It even accepted the font change.
http://lily.sytes.net/keorwxc4n29/2
On Wed, 1 Feb 2012 01:51:46 -0800 (PST)
trevordixon wrote:
>
> I've been working on something I think the LilyPond community may find very
> useful: a web-based editor. Before you check it
Very good!
I think this will benefit many people. I always wanted to quickly share some
notes with other people.
Like pastebin.com for music!
And think of the possibilites:
Wikipedia and other sites use Lilypond to show (snippets of) music.
If you create a modular editor like TinyMCE it could
61 matches
Mail list logo
