Re: Emmentaler Glyph numbers

2012-08-14 Thread Urs Liska
Thank you for this, which also worked for me. As I wanted to have it the 'fontspec' way, I tried from there and came up with \newcommand*{\lilyGlyph}[2]{\fontspec[Scale=#1]{Emmentaler-11} \XeTeXglyph\XeTeXglyphindex"#2" } and then (for exmple) \newcommand*{\flatflat}{\raisebox{0.2ex}{\lilyGly

Re: Emmentaler Glyph numbers

2012-08-14 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> Thanks for this info (although I'd prefer not having to have it :-( ) > Can you tell me how I can access a glyph by name from XeLaTeX / > fontspec then? Looking into XeTeX-reference.pdf, this works for me (assuming that you have emmentaler-20.otf installed where XeTeX can find it): The script

Re: Emmentaler Glyph numbers

2012-08-14 Thread Urs Liska
Am 14.08.2012 19:29, schrieb Werner LEMBERG: So now I know the Emmentaler Glyphs are located from E100 throughout E31C. Don't rely on character code numbers! As soon as a new glyph gets added to the Emmentaler font, they can change. The only reliable way to access the glyphs is with glyph name

Re: Emmentaler Glyph numbers

2012-08-14 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> So now I know the Emmentaler Glyphs are located from E100 throughout > E31C. Don't rely on character code numbers! As soon as a new glyph gets added to the Emmentaler font, they can change. The only reliable way to access the glyphs is with glyph names. Werner _

Re: Emmentaler Glyph numbers

2012-08-14 Thread Urs Liska
OK, I found my way myself. Sorry for the noise (which might prove not to be noise after all ...) The "wrong" characters in my Ubuntu character map were obviously some default glyphs for the Unicode glyphs at this point. After trying out the codes from 00 to FF and finding only a few single g