Shevek writes:
>
> Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
> Try enabling guile's debug mode. A while ago, the debug mode was
> turned off in lilypond, because it adds some performance penalty.
> But without debug mode, guile does not print out line numbers for
> scheme errors. We have
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 03:24:42PM -0800, Shevek wrote:
>
> Out of 5000+ lines of code with no idea where to start? That's looking for a
> needle in a haystack. I was hoping someone might be able to suggest the sort
> of thing that can cause this error, so I at least know what color the needle
> i
Graham Percival-3 wrote:
>
> Construct a tiny example.
> http://lilypond.org/tiny-examples.html
>
>> The error message is at the very end of the debug output. I would love to
>> post some relevant code, but I have no idea where to even start looking.
>> Do
>> you understand these error message
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 03:03:31PM -0800, Shevek wrote:
>
> Aha, line numbers are indeed progress. However, the line numbers for the
> error are in some lilypond library file, so that's unhelpful in tracking
> down the problem. Here's the relevant part of the compile messages:
>
> /usr/local/lily
Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
>
> Try enabling guile's debug mode. A while ago, the debug mode was turned
> off in lilypond, because it adds some performance penalty. But without
> debug mode, guile does not print out line numbers for scheme errors. We
> have recently enabled debug miode again.
>
- Ursprüngliche Mitteilung -
>
> I've recently started getting "ERROR: Wrong type (expecting pair): ()"
> when I compile the code for a rather large (5000+ lines) project, and I
> have no idea how to fix it. There is no line reference, and no
> indication what causes this problem
Try ena
Shevek writes:
> David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>> There have been a number of changes to Scheme function syntax. If your
>> file properly contains a
>> \version "x.xx.xx"
>> line corresponding to the last version _that_ _actually_ _compiled_, try
>> running
>>
>> convert-ly -ed
>>
>> on the fil
David Kastrup wrote:
>
> There have been a number of changes to Scheme function syntax. If your
> file properly contains a
> \version "x.xx.xx"
> line corresponding to the last version _that_ _actually_ _compiled_, try
> running
>
> convert-ly -ed
>
> on the file.
>
Thanks for the quic
Shevek writes:
> I've recently started getting "ERROR: Wrong type (expecting pair): ()"
> when I compile the code for a rather large (5000+ lines) project, and
> I have no idea how to fix it. There is no line reference, and no
> indication what causes this problem. Google searches seem to indicat
