Cameron Horsburgh wrote:
lilypond -dlog-file=log foo.ly
lilypond -dseparate-log-files foo.ly bar.ly
and no log files.
>
> Thoughts?
They all work on 2.11.18. Evidently something changed between 2.10 and
2.11.
Cheers,
- Graham
___
lilyp
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 02:45:46PM +0100, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> Cameron Horsburgh escreveu:
> > On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 12:09:39PM +0100, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> >
> >> don't; -dlog-file=foo is the recommended method. -dseparate-log-files if
> >> you need multiple logs.
> >
> > I might have
Cameron Horsburgh escreveu:
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 12:09:39PM +0100, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
>
>> don't; -dlog-file=foo is the recommended method. -dseparate-log-files if
>> you need multiple logs.
>
> I might have this wrong, but I have problems with each of these:
>
> lilypond -dlog-fil
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 12:09:39PM +0100, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> don't; -dlog-file=foo is the recommended method. -dseparate-log-files if
> you need multiple logs.
I might have this wrong, but I have problems with each of these:
lilypond -dlog-file=log foo.ly
runs as expected, but no log
Cameron Horsburgh escreveu:
> On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 03:13:36PM -0800, Graham Percival wrote:
>> Cameron Horsburgh wrote:
>>> On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 11:40:45AM -0800, Graham Percival wrote:
Cameron Horsburgh wrote:
> I'd love to be able to specify a log file for either each file or the
>
Cameron Horsburgh wrote:
On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 03:13:36PM -0800, Graham Percival wrote:
>
lilypond $f &> $f.log
Yeah, I eventually got that, or something pretty close. It can be pretty
useful. I might write a page for the docs regarding batch processing.
The main problem, of course, is tha
On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 03:13:36PM -0800, Graham Percival wrote:
> Cameron Horsburgh wrote:
> >On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 11:40:45AM -0800, Graham Percival wrote:
> >>Cameron Horsburgh wrote:
> >>>I'd love to be able to specify a log file for either each file or the
> >>>entire run. Does this exist? I
Cameron Horsburgh wrote:
On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 11:40:45AM -0800, Graham Percival wrote:
Cameron Horsburgh wrote:
I'd love to be able to specify a log file for either each file or the
entire run. Does this exist? If not, does anyone have any idea how I
might be able to do this?
for f in *.ly
On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 11:40:45AM -0800, Graham Percival wrote:
> Cameron Horsburgh wrote:
> >I'd love to be able to specify a log file for either each file or the
> >entire run. Does this exist? If not, does anyone have any idea how I
> >might be able to do this?
>
> for f in *.ly ; do lilypond
Cameron Horsburgh wrote:
I'd love to be able to specify a log file for either each file or the
entire run. Does this exist? If not, does anyone have any idea how I
might be able to do this?
for f in *.ly ; do lilypond $f > $f.log ; done;
Something like that, at least.
Cheers,
- Graham
_
Do you need to redirect stderr instead?
Geoff
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
11 matches
Mail list logo
