On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 02:45:46PM +0100, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > Cameron Horsburgh escreveu: > > On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 12:09:39PM +0100, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > > > >> don't; -dlog-file=foo is the recommended method. -dseparate-log-files if > >> you need multiple logs. > > > > I might have this wrong, but I have problems with each of these: > > > > lilypond -dlog-file=log foo.ly > > Please file a bug. It's called foo.log, btw. >
I tried that, and it brought up an error, which I've added to the bug report. Is the requirement to use 'foo.log' necessary, or convention? -- ============================================= Cameron Horsburgh ============================================= _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
