Re: Vanishing nested tuplet

2024-06-05 Thread Gregory Evans
Thank you so much William, yes indeed whatever problem I was experiencing has been resolved in a recent update to lilypond. regards, g.r.e. On Wed, Jun 5, 2024 at 8:39 PM William Rehwinkel < will...@williamrehwinkel.net> wrote: > On MacOS x86, When running your file on 2.25.7, only one tuplet is

Re: Vanishing nested tuplet

2024-06-05 Thread William Rehwinkel via LilyPond user discussion
On MacOS x86, When running your file on 2.25.7, only one tuplet is shown, but when running 2.25.16, both tuplets are shown. Seems like there was a bug that has recently been fixed. Can you try running on 2.25.16? Thanks, -William On 6/5/24 22:26, David Wright wrote: On Wed 05 Jun 2024 at 19:

Re: Vanishing nested tuplet

2024-06-05 Thread David Wright
On Wed 05 Jun 2024 at 19:24:48 (-0600), Gregory Evans wrote: > Hi Mark thanks for the reply, > so my mwe didn’t show, but the measure is 2/5 which means the duration of > the measure is that of a half note prolated by 5:4, so that is where the 8 > in 9:*8* comes from. > > Regardless of this discre

Re: Vanishing nested tuplet

2024-06-05 Thread Gregory Evans
Hi Mark thanks for the reply, so my mwe didn’t show, but the measure is 2/5 which means the duration of the measure is that of a half note prolated by 5:4, so that is where the 8 in 9:*8* comes from. Regardless of this discrepancy, lilypond is perfectly happy to display "incomplete" tuplets. see:

RE: Vanishing nested tuplet

2024-06-05 Thread carsonmark
Gregory, As I read it the inner 8/9 is equal to two beats of a 4/4 measure. That is insufficient to complete an entire 4/5 measure. Look at \version "2.24.3" \times 4/5 { \times 8/9 { c'16 c' c' c' c' c' c' c' c' } c'4 c' c' } Mark From: lilypond-u