El 04.03.2009, a las 15:13, aliteralmind escribió:
You gotta admit, it's a crazy amount of information for a newbie to
sift
through, even one that has some musical training.
It's a crazy amount of information to sift through, period. I have
such a new found respect for computer music notat
Valentin Villenave wrote:
>
> You have to know that we just have been spending about 18 months
> reorganizing the docs, and we did put a lot of thoughts (and
> arguments) into this process, to say the least.
>
> I would have thought that the first place to look at would be the manual:
> Musica
El 04.03.2009, a las 14:17, Kieren MacMillan escribió:
Hi Mats (et al),
It would certainly not have been obvious to me that this has
anything to do with repeats, if
I didn't know that that's the syntax used in LilyPond. Certainly,
it's related to repeating
something, but I would be surpris
Hi Mats (et al),
It would certainly not have been obvious to me that this has
anything to do with repeats, if
I didn't know that that's the syntax used in LilyPond. Certainly,
it's related to repeating
something, but I would be surprised if you could find it in any
music notation handbook
i
Valentin Villenave wrote:
I would have thought that the first place to look at would be the manual:
Musical Notation -> Repeats -> Short repeats
Can you think of anything more obvious?
It would certainly not have been obvious to me that this has anything to
do with repeats, if
I didn't kn
2009/3/4 aliteralmind :
>
> The mind boggles %-| For about three weeks now, I have been reading LY
> documentation, forum posts, snippets, and examples, yet I never came across
> this. There is SO much information to absorb. I'm feeling more and more like
> the documentation could be organized b
The mind boggles %-| For about three weeks now, I have been reading LY
documentation, forum posts, snippets, and examples, yet I never came across
this. There is SO much information to absorb. I'm feeling more and more like
the documentation could be organized better.
This is exactly what I ne
>How can I force this collision?
The manual mentions setting outside-staff-priority = ##f to keep slurs from
interfering with your goal (
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/Documentation/user/lilypond/Curves#index-slurs
Positioning text markups inside slurs ). I've also found setting X-extent
and Y-ex
Why not use an established notation practice, which is supported by LilyPond?
See
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/Documentation/user/lilypond/Short-repeats#Percent-repeats
/Mats
Quoting aliteralmind :
I have repetitive notes:
c8 c c c c c c c c c c c |
This type of repetition is fo
You can always use markup to replace the glyph.
El 03.03.2009, a las 17:51, aliteralmind escribió:
I have repetitive notes:
c8 c c c c c c c c c c c |
This type of repetition is found throughout my piece. I'm trying to
hide the
second-through-fourth beats of notes, and have a "..." i
Two possibilities:
Change secondaryMusic to be either
secondaryMusic = \relative c {
\clef bass
c8 c c
\hideNotes
c-\tweak #'extra-offset #'(0 . 2.3)_\rptDDDInStaff
c c c c c c c c
\unHideNotes
|
}
Or
secondaryMusic = \r
You might try the solution I posted in this thread a while back:
http://www.nabble.com/bracketed-silence-td18414197.html
Jon
aliteralmind wrote:
I have repetitive notes:
c8 c c c c c c c c c c c |
This type of repetition is found throughout my piece. I'm trying to hide the
second-throu
12 matches
Mail list logo
