Valentin Villenave wrote: > > You have to know that we just have been spending about 18 months > reorganizing the docs, and we did put a lot of thoughts (and > arguments) into this process, to say the least. > > I would have thought that the first place to look at would be the manual: > Musical Notation -> Repeats -> Short repeats >
I am a musician, but I'm a singer, not a writer, and I've been away from music for a while, so I'm rusty. Not to mention, I'm regretting more and more every day that I did not pay attention in my theory classes! So I did not consider this problem as related to the official term "repeat", which is why I did not look it up that way. But, touche, Valentin. Point taken. Sorry to bad-mouth such a wonderful (and FREE) project. I'm just overwhelmed with all the information in front of me. I haven't been around LilyPond long enough to know how far the docs have come. You gotta admit, it's a crazy amount of information for a newbie to sift through, even one that has some musical training. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Forcing-markup-to-be-IN-the-staff-tp22312800p22330800.html Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
