Hi,
Thank you for your replies. Using a GUI like Frescobaldi is not really
something I can do while programming. However, I can surely insert margins to
the cropped png, which is definitely what I am going to do.
Best regards,
Renato
___
lilypond-user
Hi Simon, hi David,
I am very sorry. I absolutely did not intend to make any sort of accusation. I
did word the phrase badly, led by the too impulsive thought that I couldn't
believe that LilyPond, even being so powerful, couldn't do what I thought it
would be certainly able to do.
Actually, a
On Sat 25 Feb 2017 at 04:01:43 (-0700), renyhp wrote:
> Hi,
> Thank you for your answers. I am actually programming something automated (a
> Telegram bot for LilyPond! If you are on Telegram you will find it at
> @lilypondbot), so probably the best option will be to discard using
> LilyPond's cropp
> renyhp wrote
> > I read in the documentation that it is possible to create a cropped png by
> > using "-dbackend=eps -dresolution=600 —png" and inserting this \paper
> > block:
> >
> > However, I think the cropping is too heavy. How can I produce a png with
> > some nonzero margins?
Have you t
On Sat 25 Feb 2017 at 02:26:53 (-0700), Klaus Blum wrote:
> Hi Renato, hi Andrew,
>
> Andrew Bernard wrote
> > why would you use backend = eps if you are generating a PNG file? I think
> > you can omit that.
>
> The auto-cropping features only work with the EPS backend which can also be
> used to
inners) --> http://bit.ly/bcl-lilypond
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Png-cropping-tp200437p200451.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.o
reate solutions
for what use cases they saw coming. IIUC, the PNG cropping has been
designed for use with lilypond-book, at any rate the developers didn’t
see any need for adjusting the margins. If you want to change it, you
are very welcome to propose patches, or file a concise enhancement
request
f.
It is a bit sad, though, that a so powerful tool like LilyPond can't adjust
some simple things like png output margins.
Best regards,
Renato
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Png-cropping-tp200437p200445.html
Sent from the User mailing list
;X"
but I don't think this will result in a usable workflow.
Maybe it's easier to add margins with an image editor that has automatic
batch processing like IrfanView.
Cheers,
Klaus
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Png-cropping-tp200437p
HI Renato,
As an aside, why would you use backend = eps if you are generating a PNG
file? I think you can omit that.
Andrew
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
I read in the documentation that it is possible to create a cropped png by
using "-dbackend=eps -dresolution=600 —png" and inserting this \paper block:
\paper{
indent=0\mm
line-width=120\mm
oddHeaderMarkup = ##f
evenHeaderMarkup = ##f
oddFooterMarkup = ##f
evenFooterMarkup
Yes, that would probably do it. I'll see if I can sort any of it out
tonight after the kids are in bed. Thanks for the suggestion, as
always, Patrick. :)
Jon
Patrick Horgan wrote:
Jonathan Kulp wrote:
I've actually tried to do this. I booted into the Windows partition
of my machine and in
Francisco Vila wrote:
2008/10/3 Jonathan Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Patrick, you mentioned at some point along the way that it would have been
better if I had started the whole thing in Python instead of bash. Would
this also have made it easier to port to Windows?
It wouldn't make it an
Jonathan Kulp wrote:
I've actually tried to do this. I booted into the Windows partition
of my machine and installed Cygwin and the netpbm package, but I had
trouble finding the netpbm stuff from the Cygwin bash shell. The
shell seemed very isolated from the rest of the machine, as I couldn't
2008/10/3 Jonathan Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Patrick, you mentioned at some point along the way that it would have been
> better if I had started the whole thing in Python instead of bash. Would
> this also have made it easier to port to Windows?
IMO yes, as for the script itself, and no, as fo
I've actually tried to do this. I booted into the Windows partition of
my machine and installed Cygwin and the netpbm package, but I had
trouble finding the netpbm stuff from the Cygwin bash shell. The shell
seemed very isolated from the rest of the machine, as I couldn't access
any of the do
Tomas Valusek wrote:
Jonathan Kulp napsal(a):
After much revision, addition, and general fussing about with it, I'm
happy to post the official version of what we're calling
"lily2image," a script for converting lilypond source files to
cropped image files in many different formats suitable
If you have the skills to translate it to Windows that'd be great. I
don't know the first thing about Windows so I can't do it myself. I'd
really appreciate it if someone could make a Windows version of
lily2image :)
Jon
Tomas Valusek wrote:
Jonathan Kulp napsal(a):
After much revision,
If you are familiar with scripting, and have Windows, use it as a
template. But my guess is you will need to find different utilities to
do the conversion and cropping. This is pretty straight-forward to do,
since most of these utilities run just fine on linux and mac (though
most scripts c
Jonathan Kulp napsal(a):
After much revision, addition, and general fussing about with it, I'm
happy to post the official version of what we're calling "lily2image," a
script for converting lilypond source files to cropped image files in
many different formats suitable for insertion into doc
After much revision, addition, and general fussing about with it, I'm
happy to post the official version of what we're calling "lily2image," a
script for converting lilypond source files to cropped image files in
many different formats suitable for insertion into documents (theses,
research pa
I'd like to try to implement the -q quiet mode and see if I can do it. I
think with all of Patrick's flags I can see how he's been doing it and
make the -q work. Hopefully tonight after the kids are asleep.
Jon
Josh Parmenter wrote:
That makes sense as well.
Josh
On Sep 19, 2008, at 3:09 PM
That makes sense as well.
Josh
On Sep 19, 2008, at 3:09 PM, Patrick Horgan wrote:
Jonathan Kulp wrote:
Thanks for trying it out, Josh! Glad to hear it worked for you on
OSX. Patrick has been dealing with the flags, and I don't really
understand how to do them, so my very dirty solution
Jonathan Kulp wrote:
Thanks for trying it out, Josh! Glad to hear it worked for you on
OSX. Patrick has been dealing with the flags, and I don't really
understand how to do them, so my very dirty solution would be simply
to comment out the last bit of the script that opens the file :). I
c
Not on OSX. You are using the 'open' command, and this will open the
file regardless of the viewer that is passed in.
Josh
On Sep 19, 2008, at 2:51 PM, Patrick Horgan wrote:
Josh Parmenter wrote:
I've been following this, and just tested the latest version on
OSX... quite nice guys!
Perh
Thanks for trying it out, Josh! Glad to hear it worked for you on OSX.
Patrick has been dealing with the flags, and I don't really
understand how to do them, so my very dirty solution would be simply to
comment out the last bit of the script that opens the file :). I can
see how this would
Josh Parmenter wrote:
I've been following this, and just tested the latest version on OSX...
quite nice guys!
Perhaps the -V flag can be set to not open the image after it is done?
This utility will be great for mass creating images (as most command
line tools are), but having Preview open ea
I've been following this, and just tested the latest version on OSX...
quite nice guys!
Perhaps the -V flag can be set to not open the image after it is done?
This utility will be great for mass creating images (as most command
line tools are), but having Preview open each one up will get v
Ok I've caught on to your version-control comments at the top and have
started adding to them. This time I added two things to the script:
1) recognition of the computer's OS (only Linux or Mac at this point),
and appropriate changes to the commands to accommodate. After this
change, the scr
Mark Knoop wrote:
On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 17:41 -0700, Patrick Horgan wrote:
Of course if you pick one that eog doesn't know how to display it
will complain.
Perhaps replace eog with xdg-open for better portability?
"xdg-open - opens a file or URL in the user’s pref
Jonathan Kulp wrote:
Patrick!
It's all working beautifully now.
I must say that you are most awesomely cool. How wonderful to find
someone that digs in in the best linux/Unix tradition and puts together
a string of programs to achieve a desired result. Hats off to you.
... much cool stuff
This is a good idea. I tried it and it behaves exactly the same as
before. I had wondered about this, not with respect to the different
file formats, but with different desktop environments. I imagine eog
wouldn't behave properly in KDE, for example. Does xdg-open work for
KDE? Or does tha
On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 17:41 -0700, Patrick Horgan wrote:
> Of course if you pick one that eog doesn't know how to display it
> will complain.
Perhaps replace eog with xdg-open for better portability?
"xdg-open - opens a file or URL in the user’s preferred application"
--
Mark Knoop
___
Patrick! It's all working beautifully now. I've tried about 10
different configurations of options using both the flags and the
prompts, and everything worked just as expected. This is a really great
tool! I like being able to use either the command-line arguments or the
prompts. The argumen
Jonathan Kulp wrote:
Hi Patrick,
I've been running your script trying to use the command-line
arguments, and something's happening with the format argument. I
specify it with an argument, but then I still get prompted for
format. I might not be doing the flag right. I've tried it with
-f=
Alright, this is probably my last version. It now checks the input
for format against all the available conversions (found by looking for
all the programs in the filesystem that start with ppmto and pnmto) and
if you didn't pick one, gives you all the choices!
Enter desired output format
Hi Patrick,
I've been running your script trying to use the command-line arguments,
and something's happening with the format argument. I specify it with
an argument, but then I still get prompted for format. I might not be
doing the flag right. I've tried it with -f=jpeg, -f=JPEG, -fJPEG,
Cool, Patrick! Your scripting skills are admirable! The only thing
that worked unlike I expected was when I was asked if I wanted
transparency, I simply hit "enter," thinking it would default to "no"
because the N was capitalized, and it prompted me again saying
"expecting one of these values
Jonathan Kulp wrote:
Ok I
changed a couple of things to make it even more flexible. I changed
pnmto__ to ppmto__, giving quite a few more output options. I've
suggested a few in the script. Also added an option to choose either
gif or png when choosing transparent background. this is fun :)
Patrick,
Sorry to keep posting new versions but I found another problem with my
previous one, which is that there's no ppmtopng command, so I had to add
another if-then statement to fix it. I also learned a couple of things
from your script that are very useful (e.g. accepting equally "yes,"
This looks really great but it failed when I tried to run it. I must
have messed it up when copying it over to my editor. Would you mind
attaching a working copy as a file instead of copying into the email?
Also, I think we crossed paths in our most recent posts about this. I
sent a revised
2008/9/18 Patrick Horgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> There must be more than this--I don't get any .png file when I use this
> option. Only postscript and pdf.
You have to use it with --png or -fpng or --format=png.
Regards,
Neil
___
lilypond-user mailin
Sorry, one more adjustment to the script. I found out that there's no
ppmtotiff command, so I had to add another conditional to accommodate
that. Seems to work with all combinations now:
#!/bin/bash
#*#
# Script for making image files from
Neil Puttock wrote:
Hi Jon,
2008/9/17 Jonathan Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I'm guessing that one of the netpbm tools will handle transparency, it's
just a matter of figuring out which one. Didn't this come up on a recent
thread? I seem to remember trying it out on something and ge
Here's a modified version of Jonathan's unix/linux script that supports
arguments which are:
-t or --transparency : output format forced to png and you get
transparency
-r=N or --resolution==N : (example -r=72) set resolution
-f=FORMAT or --format=FORMAT : (example -f=jpeg) set
Ok I changed a couple of things to make it even more flexible. I
changed pnmto__ to ppmto__, giving quite a few more output options.
I've suggested a few in the script. Also added an option to choose
either gif or png when choosing transparent background. this is fun :)
Jon
script attached
Ok I rewrote it a bit to allow for transparent background and I think it
works nicely. I changed it to ask whether the user wants a transparent
background right after entering the output resolution. If transparent =
yes, then it does not prompt for an output format but instead uses png
by def
Jonathan Kulp wrote:
I'm guessing that one of the netpbm tools will handle transparency,
it's just a matter of figuring out which one. Didn't this come up on
a recent thread? I seem to remember trying it out on something and
getting a transparent background. When I get some time later I'll
Josh Parmenter wrote:
You can set the tagline to "" in the \header block.
Ah, but I specifically asked for a way to do it without editing the file
so the script to do it via command line argument. This just doesn't
make the cut NEXT!
Patrick
__
Hi Jon,
2008/9/17 Jonathan Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'm guessing that one of the netpbm tools will handle transparency, it's
> just a matter of figuring out which one. Didn't this come up on a recent
> thread? I seem to remember trying it out on something and getting a
> transparent backgroun
I'm guessing that one of the netpbm tools will handle transparency, it's
just a matter of figuring out which one. Didn't this come up on a
recent thread? I seem to remember trying it out on something and
getting a transparent background. When I get some time later I'll look
into it. It woul
You can set the tagline to "" in the \header block.
%% SuperCollider output from Wed Sep 17 12:58:57 2008
\paper {
#(set-paper-size "letter")
}
\include "english.ly"
\header {
tagline = ""
}
%Voice0
soprano = \new Voice = "soprano" {
< c' ef' g'>4
< b f' g'>4
Jonathan Kulp wrote:
This is an old thread but I found it in my email box and thought I'd
respond because I've recently written a script to handle this sort of
thing. I share with some trepidation since last time I shared a
script, someone pointed out to me that there was already a lilypond
c
This is an old thread but I found it in my email box and thought I'd
respond because I've recently written a script to handle this sort of
thing. I share with some trepidation since last time I shared a script,
someone pointed out to me that there was already a lilypond command-line
option tha
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 14:41:24 +
David Bobroff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm LilyPonding a piece which requires a "Notation Key". The
> recipient of this notation key will be doing a bit of further
> manipulation of the output. What I need to provide is, at her
> preference, a PNG closely c
I'm LilyPonding a piece which requires a "Notation Key". The recipient
of this notation key will be doing a bit of further manipulation of the
output. What I need to provide is, at her preference, a PNG closely
cropped so that she can then position this graphic under some
introductory text ab
56 matches
Mail list logo
