Pretty basic really. If you figure out a way to get the point and click
thing working with TexShop I would appreciate hearing about it.
I'm not an expert, but I don't think it is possible because point and
click works with the ".dvi" file, but I couldn't find any dvi reader
that works natively o
On 3/2/05 10:30 AM, "Kieren Richard MacMillan"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, Walter:
>
>> Another editor that I have enjoyed for quite some time now is TeXShop.
>
> I use TeXShop on OS X for my mathematics typesetting -- I agree that
> it's quite a good app.
>
> What are the steps I need to
Hi, Walter:
Another editor that I have enjoyed for quite some time now is TeXShop.
I use TeXShop on OS X for my mathematics typesetting -- I agree that
it's quite a good app.
What are the steps I need to perform (if any) to prepare it for
Lilypond editing? Sounds like that would be much easier t
On 3/2/05 5:14 AM, "Libero Mureddu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What is slow?
> typing, performing operation like run lily, etc.
> Because also on my computer is quite slow in launching and opening the
> windows, but not impossible to use, I thought was because of Java.
> That's why I prefer to
Libero Mureddu írta:
What is slow?
typing, performing operation like run lily, etc.
Because also on my computer is quite slow in launching and opening the
windows, but not impossible to use, I thought was because of Java.
That's why I prefer to use emacs, I never felt very confortable with
jedi
What is slow?
typing, performing operation like run lily, etc.
Because also on my computer is quite slow in launching and opening the
windows, but not impossible to use, I thought was because of Java.
That's why I prefer to use emacs, I never felt very confortable with
jedit on my mac, because
For some reason, jedit's really slow on my Mac (1GHz iBook G4, 512Mb
RAM, OS X 10.3.8). Even with the syntax completion features turned off,
lily4jedit is not really useable. Does anyone else have this? Any
ideas? I've tried increasing the amount of memory given to the Java
interpreter, but it
And my idea was that a copy of jedit with lilypond preinstalled
might be a good candidate to include in this environment. :-)
/Mats
Libero Mureddu wrote:
Il giorno 28/feb/05, alle 13:17, Mats Bengtsson ha scritto:
Take a look at the text editor jedit, which has very good support
for LilyPond, se
Il giorno 28/feb/05, alle 13:17, Mats Bengtsson ha scritto:
Take a look at the text editor jedit, which has very good support
for LilyPond, see
http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.4/Documentation/user/out-www/lilypond/
Editor-support.html
Thanks, but I know and use jedit, my suggestion was about creat
Take a look at the text editor jedit, which has very good support
for LilyPond, see
http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.4/Documentation/user/out-www/lilypond/Editor-support.html
/Mats
Libero Mureddu wrote:
Hi!
In my impression lilypond.app should be like MacCsound
(www.csounds.com/matt/MacCsound), Cs
Hi!
In my impression lilypond.app should be like MacCsound
(www.csounds.com/matt/MacCsound), Csound is a text environment for
electronic music, it runs on a command line, but the version for mac
provides a very simple text editor ready for syntax, correction of
mistakes and some GUI elements (t
(Apologies to the moderator; I sent this from the wrong address at
first.)
On Feb 25, 2005, at 04:22, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
BTW, the description of getting Lilypond up and running on a pristine
MacOS X (getting XCode, lots of compilation) seems rather involved. I
wonder whether there would be a
My feeling is that Lilypond is different that GB, and concerning the
notation, it is superior in many ways (I'm not sure though, can anyone
send a PDF sample to me?). If anything, it should be as expensive.
As a mac user, two cents:
1) GB is also an audio/midi editor. So, it can be compared only ve
Han-Wen (et al.):
My feeling is that Lilypond is different that GB
Agreed -- if any comparison is to be made, it should be with like
products (Sibeilus, Finale, etc.).
However, it's hard to put a price on the "non-GUI-interface" factor:
although Lilypond is clearly the superior typesetter (just
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> BTW, I'm quite happy using GNU/Emacs with lilypond on my Mac.
>
> >
> > And: if you think that is cool idea, what would be a reasonable price?
> >
> I know you're living on a tight budget, but I've no feeling for the
> Mac price market out there. My feeling is that it
Somehow I always manage to forget to copy the list:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>> Il giorno 21/feb/05, alle 18:45, Han-Wen Nienhuys ha scritto:
>>
>> >>
>> >
>> > Could you install it as HTML files on a website somewhere, so we can
>> > make it show up in our browser?
>> >
>> No, I'm trying to
Hi,
> I am not sure, that's why I'm asking. Initially, my thoughts go out to
> a subscription: we provide regular builds, and the subscriber is able
> download those during X months. Perhaps there could support for
> installation troubleshooting as well.
Sounds OK for me as well, but Fink works
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Since I have no trouble with my current install (via Fink), I'm not
> sure it would make much difference to me personally.
> However, I would have a SIGNIFICANTLY easier time "selling" Lilypond to
> other (new) users if there were a "standard" installation process, so
Hello, Han-Wen:
BTW, the description of getting Lilypond up and running on a pristine
MacOS X (getting XCode, lots of compilation) seems rather involved.
I wonder whether there would be any interest in a "native" MacOS X
binary of Lilypond, with a pretty installer. An binary which is up and
running
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Il giorno 21/feb/05, alle 18:45, Han-Wen Nienhuys ha scritto:
>
> >>
> >
> > Could you install it as HTML files on a website somewhere, so we can
> > make it show up in our browser?
> >
> No, I'm trying to find some free web space somewhere but I cannot make
> it.
> Ho
20 matches
Mail list logo
