Re: Long stretch in one voice, then two

2014-09-30 Thread Janek Warchoł
2014-09-28 23:42 GMT+02:00 Simon Albrecht : > Well probably it's intuitive for German native speakers by analogy to "eine > Stimme" and "Stimme Eins", that what I meant. > The next question, of course, is: Do you have an alternative proposal? :-) For example \singleVoice. Knute's \voiceNeutral wo

Re: Long stretch in one voice, then two

2014-09-29 Thread Abraham Lee
+1! I think that makes perfect sense and feels very coherent with the other functions. Regards, Abraham Sent from my iPhone > On Sep 29, 2014, at 1:18 AM, Knute Snortum wrote: > > Well, mine would be "\voiceNeutral", but I'm not demanding that! It would > fit with \tieUp -> \tieNeutral,

Re: Long stretch in one voice, then two

2014-09-29 Thread Knute Snortum
Well, mine would be "\voiceNeutral", but I'm not demanding that! It would fit with \tieUp -> \tieNeutral, \slurUp -> \slurNeutral, etc. Knute Snortum (via Gmail) On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Simon Albrecht wrote: > Well probably it's intuitive for German native speakers by analogy to > "e

Re: Long stretch in one voice, then two

2014-09-28 Thread Simon Albrecht
Well probably it's intuitive for German native speakers by analogy to "eine Stimme" and "Stimme Eins", that what I meant. The next question, of course, is: Do you have an alternative proposal? :-) Good night again (...) Simon Am 28-Sep-2014 23:28:42 +0200 schrieb janek.lilyp...@gmail.com: 2014-

Re: Long stretch in one voice, then two

2014-09-28 Thread Janek Warchoł
2014-09-28 23:25 GMT+02:00 Simon Albrecht : > Hello, > > do you really think they aren't user-friendly? I always found them easy to > understand and use. Is this because they comply to german syntax more > neatly? We have two commands named \voiceOne and \oneVoice. That's definitely confusing; on

Re: Long stretch in one voice, then two

2014-09-28 Thread Simon Albrecht
Hello, do you really think they aren't user-friendly? I always found them easy to understand and use. Is this because they comply to german syntax more neatly? Anyway... And I agree with the docs on the explicit/implicit voicing: it depends... Some pieces are easier to input and read with the m

Re: Long stretch in one voice, then two

2014-09-27 Thread Knute Snortum
Excellent. That's what I'll do. Thanks. Knute Snortum (via Gmail) On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Janek Warchoł wrote: > 2014-09-27 19:44 GMT+02:00 Knute Snortum : > > This question may be a matter of style, or there may be a command I'm > > missing. > > > > I have a piano piece that start

Re: Long stretch in one voice, then two

2014-09-27 Thread Janek Warchoł
2014-09-27 19:44 GMT+02:00 Knute Snortum : > This question may be a matter of style, or there may be a command I'm > missing. > > I have a piano piece that starts with the right hand in one voice for a long > stretch (about 20 bars). It then breaks into mostly two voices. > > One way to do this is

Long stretch in one voice, then two

2014-09-27 Thread Knute Snortum
This question may be a matter of style, or there may be a command I'm missing. I have a piano piece that starts with the right hand in one voice for a long stretch (about 20 bars). It then breaks into mostly two voices. One way to do this is to use temporary voices. The disadvantage is long pas