+1! I think that makes perfect sense and feels very coherent with the other functions.
Regards, Abraham Sent from my iPhone > On Sep 29, 2014, at 1:18 AM, Knute Snortum <ksnor...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Well, mine would be "\voiceNeutral", but I'm not demanding that! It would > fit with \tieUp -> \tieNeutral, \slurUp -> \slurNeutral, etc. > > > Knute Snortum > (via Gmail) > >> On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Simon Albrecht <simon.albre...@mail.de> >> wrote: >> Well probably it's intuitive for German native speakers by analogy to "eine >> Stimme" and "Stimme Eins", that what I meant. >> The next question, of course, is: Do you have an alternative proposal? :-) >> Good night again (...) >> Simon >> >> Am 28-Sep-2014 23:28:42 +0200 schrieb janek.lilyp...@gmail.com: >> >> 2014-09-28 23:25 GMT+02:00 Simon Albrecht <simon.albre...@mail.de>: >> > Hello, >> > >> > do you really think they aren't user-friendly? I always found them easy to >> > understand and use. Is this because they comply to german syntax more >> > neatly? >> >> We have two commands named \voiceOne and \oneVoice. That's definitely >> confusing; one of them should be given a different name. >> >> good night, >> Janek > > _______________________________________________ > lilypond-user mailing list > lilypond-user@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
