Dear Matt,
I dont compose. I arrange, mainly church music (choir, brass-choir,
organ, piano) and theory (combining texts and music). Seldom using
parts...
The beginning was quite arduous, I had no idea of programmin and
wanted to arrange directly in ly. Got it but then came Frescobaldi and
changed
On Thu, 2015-01-08 at 16:35 -0800, Matthew James Briggs wrote:
>
> I'm starting to wonder if I should just skip it and learn Lilypond
> instead, thus my object-oriented world could output Lilypond code
> instead of MusicXML.
I think that would be very wise: IMHO MusicXML gives the impression of
On Thu, 2015-01-08 at 22:22 +0100, Urs Liska wrote:
> To make it short: LilyPond has a totally different approach to
> "extracting" parts. And I'm sure it will serve you well.
You may also like to know that the Denemo music input program as well as
putting parts in LilyPond variables can also gene
Sounds like you might as well be interested in
* http://www.projectabjad.org/ and
* http://web.mit.edu/music21/.
hth
patrick
On 09.01.2015, at 01:35, Matthew James Briggs
wrote:
> Thank you everyone for the info. Lilypond sounds totally awesome.
>
> Just a little more background because the
Thank you everyone for the info. Lilypond sounds totally awesome.
Just a little more background because there may be folks here with insight
on these things (PM if not appropriate for the forum): One of my major
goals is to generate musical material with an object-oriented
representation of musi
On 2015-01-08 04:10 PM, Matthew James Briggs wrote:
Hello, I just joined this list because I was searching unsuccessfully
for information about Lilypond's features for extracting and producing
individual parts from a score. Does Lilypond have features akin to
Finale's linked-parts?
I suspect
HI Matt,
Welcome to Lilyponding. Your missive reads as though you can wrap your
head around things well enough. Sometimes it is dangerous to think
about things in terms of Finale methods. Of course parts can be
extracted. In this case, parts are a thing of formal structure. My
advice to proceed, a
Hi Matt,
if you mean "part" like the music of one instrument or singer, for sure this is
possible: You can store each such part in a variable (say flute and piano) and
then you can print one of them:
\flute
or
\piano
or you can print the combined score of the two:
<<
\flute
\piano
>>
Thi
elp:
http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/notation/including-lilypond-files
-David
- Original Message -
From: "Matthew James Briggs"
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Thursday, January 8, 2015 4:10:15 PM
Subject: Information about Parts
Hello, I just joined this list bec
To make it short: LilyPond has a totally different approach to
"extracting" parts. And I'm sure it will serve you well.
Basically you store your music in variables (e.g. one variable for each
"part", say "violin 1" or "soprano").
Then you put them together in a \score { } expression, stacking a
Hello, I just joined this list because I was searching unsuccessfully for
information about Lilypond's features for extracting and producing
individual parts from a score. Does Lilypond have features akin to
Finale's linked-parts?
I suspect my searching was unsuccessful since the work "part" is u
11 matches
Mail list logo
