Am 22.09.2012 13:33, schrieb TaoCG:
Marc Hohl wrote
Perhaps \once \override Glissando #'extra-dy = #0.5?
Yes, perfect. Thank you!
Glad I could help! ;-)
Marc
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Glissando-from-e-flat-to-e-tp133308p133315.html
Sent
Marc Hohl wrote
> Perhaps \once \override Glissando #'extra-dy = #0.5?
Yes, perfect. Thank you!
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Glissando-from-e-flat-to-e-tp133308p133315.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Na
Am 22.09.2012 12:37, schrieb m...@mikesolomon.org:
On 22 sept. 2012, at 12:33, TaoCG wrote:
I need to typeset a glissando from e-flat to e and I'd like it to look as if
it'd go upward, right now the line is straight and not actually visible
because it collides with the staff line.
On 22 sept. 2012, at 12:33, TaoCG wrote:
> I need to typeset a glissando from e-flat to e and I'd like it to look as if
> it'd go upward, right now the line is straight and not actually visible
> because it collides with the staff line.
> I suppose the property to edit i
I need to typeset a glissando from e-flat to e and I'd like it to look as if
it'd go upward, right now the line is straight and not actually visible
because it collides with the staff line.
I suppose the property to edit is normalized-endpoints but changing it
didn't seem to
