Re: GDP: Time to plan the revision of NR 2 "Specialist Notation"

2008-04-04 Thread René Brandenburger
Am Donnerstag, den 03.04.2008, 18:30 +0100 schrieb Trevor Daniels: > René Brandenburger wrote: > > a topic which I think could be interisting is > > 2.7 Lyrics and repeats > > Good idea. Added. I might come back to you for some > ideas for the text later :) you're welcome ;-) > > Trevor D

Re: GDP: Time to plan the revision of NR 2 "Specialist Notation"

2008-04-04 Thread Trevor Daniels
Neil Puttock wrote: I'm broadly happy with the proposed layout. There are just two minor issues I have: 1. Section 2.1.4.3 should be changed to "Adding singers' names to stanzas", unless we're talking about pseudonyms and stage names :) Good catch. Probably stage names are more commonly plac

Re: GDP: Time to plan the revision of NR 2 "Specialist Notation"

2008-04-04 Thread Neil Puttock
Hi Trevor, I'm broadly happy with the proposed layout. There are just two minor issues I have: 1. Section 2.1.4.3 should be changed to "Adding singers' names to stanzas", unless we're talking about pseudonyms and stage names :) 2. Under "Keyboard instruments", I'd prefer "Changing staff manuall

Re: GDP: Time to plan the revision of NR 2 "Specialist Notation"

2008-04-04 Thread Trevor Daniels
Ian Hulin wrote: Trevor Daniels wrote: Grand Documentation Project Do we need a 2.4.4 under Fretted stringed instruments for Mandolin, or a 2.4.5 for the viols? Happy to add them if we have something to write under the heading which is specific to those instruments. Do you have anything in

Re: GDP: Time to plan the revision of NR 2 "Specialist Notation"

2008-04-04 Thread Ian Hulin
Trevor Daniels wrote: LilyPond-ers Grand Documentation Project Graham and his helpers have now completed a large part of the GDP revision of the first chapter of the Notation Reference (NR), most of the Learning Manual (LM) is finished, and the Music Glossary (MG) has been greatly extended.

Re: GDP: Time to plan the revision of NR 2 "Specialist Notation"

2008-04-03 Thread Reinhold Kainhofer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Donnerstag, 3. April 2008 schrieb Graham Percival: > And bowing, for string players? > > "Bowing may be added to scores like other articulations; for more > information, see @ref{articulations and ornamentations}. The > exact names of bowings are d

Re: GDP: Time to plan the revision of NR 2 "Specialist Notation"

2008-04-03 Thread Graham Percival
On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 23:40:34 +0200 "Valentin Villenave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/4/3, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > c2\upbow > > c2\downbow > > Seems consistent to me... Do you mean you don't like this sentence? \upbow is listed in Appendix B.something. How to use articu

Re: GDP: Time to plan the revision of NR 2 "Specialist Notation"

2008-04-03 Thread Valentin Villenave
2008/4/3, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > And bowing, for string players? > > "Bowing may be added to scores like other articulations; for more > information, see @ref{articulations and ornamentations}. The > exact names of bowings are described in @ref{List of articulations}." > ? > >

Re: GDP: Time to plan the revision of NR 2 "Specialist Notation"

2008-04-03 Thread Graham Percival
On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 21:54:19 +0200 "Valentin Villenave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/4/3, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > As you all know, I'm not at all fond of duplication in the docs, > > but I'm having difficulty arguing that "String music" would be > > easier to understand

Re: GDP: Time to plan the revision of NR 2 "Specialist Notation"

2008-04-03 Thread Valentin Villenave
2008/4/3, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Maybe add a "Constructs often used by" subsubsection, which gives > specific examples (of bowing, breathing, etc) along with links to > the earlier sections? I think this is the best solution. > As you all know, I'm not at all fond of duplicat

Re: GDP: Time to plan the revision of NR 2 "Specialist Notation"

2008-04-03 Thread Graham Percival
On Thu, 03 Apr 2008 17:09:01 +0200 Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Valentin Villenave wrote: > > > > If we decide to add "bowing indications" in Strings, we should > > consider adding "Breathing indications" to Wind instruments, > > shouldn't we? > > > I've often seen breathing indi

Re: GDP: Time to plan the revision of NR 2 "Specialist Notation"

2008-04-03 Thread Trevor Daniels
René Brandenburger wrote: a topic which I think could be interisting is 2.7 Lyrics and repeats Good idea. Added. I might come back to you for some ideas for the text later :) Trevor D ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http:/

Re: GDP: Time to plan the revision of NR 2 "Specialist Notation"

2008-04-03 Thread Trevor Daniels
Valentin wrote: Perhaps Accordion (and not "Accordian") should go into Wind instruments? Thanks - corrected. and If we decide to add "bowing indications" in Strings, we should consider adding "Breathing indications" to Wind instruments, shouldn't we? Mats wrote: I've often seen breathing i

Re: GDP: Time to plan the revision of NR 2 "Specialist Notation"

2008-04-03 Thread René Brandenburger
Am Donnerstag, den 03.04.2008, 14:14 +0100 schrieb Trevor Daniels: > > The next step is to revise the second chapter in the Notation Reference - NR > 2 "Specialist notation". To kick off this process the new suggested section > headings can be found at http://web.uvic.ca/~gperciva/NR2-draft.tx

Re: GDP: Time to plan the revision of NR 2 "Specialist Notation"

2008-04-03 Thread Mats Bengtsson
Valentin Villenave wrote: If we decide to add "bowing indications" in Strings, we should consider adding "Breathing indications" to Wind instruments, shouldn't we? I've often seen breathing indications both in string music as well as vocal music. /Mats

Re: GDP: Time to plan the revision of NR 2 "Specialist Notation"

2008-04-03 Thread Reinhold Kainhofer
Am Donnerstag, 3. April 2008 schrieb Valentin Villenave: > Perhaps Accordion (and not "Accordian") should go into Wind instruments? No, because an accordion is not a wind instrument (see the definition of a wind instrumen in wikipedia), but rather a keyboard instrument (sub-category aerophones).

Re: GDP: Time to plan the revision of NR 2 "Specialist Notation"

2008-04-03 Thread Valentin Villenave
2008/4/3, Trevor Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > The next step is to revise the second chapter in the Notation Reference - > NR 2 "Specialist notation". To kick off this process the new suggested > section headings can be found at > http://web.uvic.ca/~gperciva/NR2-draft.txt , and we now > need y

GDP: Time to plan the revision of NR 2 "Specialist Notation"

2008-04-03 Thread Trevor Daniels
LilyPond-ers Grand Documentation Project Graham and his helpers have now completed a large part of the GDP revision of the first chapter of the Notation Reference (NR), most of the Learning Manual (LM) is finished, and the Music Glossary (MG) has been greatly extended. Pulling snippets from