El 04.03.2009, a las 15:13, aliteralmind escribió:
You gotta admit, it's a crazy amount of information for a newbie to
sift
through, even one that has some musical training.
It's a crazy amount of information to sift through, period. I have
such a new found respect for computer music notat
haven't been around LilyPond long enough to know how far the docs have
come.
You gotta admit, it's a crazy amount of information for a newbie to sift
through, even one that has some musical training.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Forcing-markup-to-be-IN-the-staf
El 04.03.2009, a las 14:17, Kieren MacMillan escribió:
Hi Mats (et al),
It would certainly not have been obvious to me that this has
anything to do with repeats, if
I didn't know that that's the syntax used in LilyPond. Certainly,
it's related to repeating
something, but I would be surpris
Hi Mats (et al),
It would certainly not have been obvious to me that this has
anything to do with repeats, if
I didn't know that that's the syntax used in LilyPond. Certainly,
it's related to repeating
something, but I would be surprised if you could find it in any
music notation handbook
i
Valentin Villenave wrote:
I would have thought that the first place to look at would be the manual:
Musical Notation -> Repeats -> Short repeats
Can you think of anything more obvious?
It would certainly not have been obvious to me that this has anything to
do with repeats, if
I didn't kn
2009/3/4 aliteralmind :
>
> The mind boggles %-| For about three weeks now, I have been reading LY
> documentation, forum posts, snippets, and examples, yet I never came across
> this. There is SO much information to absorb. I'm feeling more and more like
> the documentation could be organized b
hat I need Mats, thank you. And fortunately, the other
responses are very helpful as well, for unrelated issues I'm having. So
thank you to all.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Forcing-markup-to-be-IN-the-staff-tp22312800p22328780.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - Us
the collision
avoidance routine without resorting to the whims of extra-offset?
David
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Forcing-markup-to-be-IN-the-staff-tp22312800p22324651.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive
{ s1 }
>>
\context Lyrics = mainLyrics \lyricsto vMain \mainWords
\context Lyrics = secondaryLyrics \lyricsto vSecondary
\secondaryWords
>>
\layout {}
\midi {}
}
rics = mainLyrics \lyricsto vMain \mainWords
\context Lyrics = secondaryLyrics \lyricsto vSecondary
\secondaryWords
>>
\layout {}
\midi {}
}
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Forcing-markup-
to-be-IN-the-staff-tp22312
nd-user-bounces+nick.payne=internode.on@gnu.org
> [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+nick.payne=internode.on@gnu.org] On
> Behalf Of aliteralmind
> Sent: Wednesday, 4 March 2009 03:52
> To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
> Subject: Forcing markup to be IN the staff
>
>
> I have r
You might try the solution I posted in this thread a while back:
http://www.nabble.com/bracketed-silence-td18414197.html
Jon
aliteralmind wrote:
I have repetitive notes:
c8 c c c c c c c c c c c |
This type of repetition is found throughout my piece. I'm trying to hide the
second-throu
t;
\layout {}
\midi {}
}
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Forcing-markup-to-be-IN-the-staff-tp22312800p22312800.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
13 matches
Mail list logo
