George,
On 10 December 2011 17:45, George_ wrote:
>
>
> pkx166h-2 wrote:
>>
>> George,
>>
>> On 30 November 2011 22:16, George Xu wrote:
>>
>>> Oops, sorry. 2.14.2. I guess that explains why \auto-footnote doesn't
>>> work, but it doesn't help much...
...
> I agree, the 2.15 docs seem to have it
"m...@apollinemike.com" writes:
> Le Dec 11, 2011 à 10:59 AM, David Kastrup a écrit :
>
>> "m...@apollinemike.com" writes:
>>
>>> Le Dec 11, 2011 à 8:06 AM, David Kastrup a écrit :
>>>
Anyway, let's take a look at two contenders:
There is an optional argument before number-pair
Le Dec 11, 2011 à 10:59 AM, David Kastrup a écrit :
> "m...@apollinemike.com" writes:
>
>> Le Dec 11, 2011 à 8:06 AM, David Kastrup a écrit :
>>
>>> Anyway, let's take a look at two contenders:
>>>
>>> There is an optional argument before number-pair giving the symbol, and
>>> an optional mark
"m...@apollinemike.com" writes:
> Le Dec 11, 2011 à 8:06 AM, David Kastrup a écrit :
>
>> Anyway, let's take a look at two contenders:
>>
>> There is an optional argument before number-pair giving the symbol, and
>> an optional markup text before the footnote. So we do
>>
>> footnote =
>> #(de
Le Dec 11, 2011 à 8:06 AM, David Kastrup a écrit :
> "m...@apollinemike.com" writes:
>
>> Le Dec 10, 2011 à 9:18 PM, David Kastrup a écrit :
>>
>>>
>>> Why don't we have \footnote \default for autonumbering (just like with
>>> \mark),
>>
>> We could...I don't understand how \default wor
David Kastrup writes:
> David Kastrup writes:
>
>> "m...@apollinemike.com" writes:
>>
>>> Le Dec 10, 2011 à 9:18 PM, David Kastrup a écrit :
>>>
>
Why don't we have \footnote \default for autonumbering (just like with
\mark),
>>>
>>> We could...I don't understand how \defau
David Kastrup writes:
> "m...@apollinemike.com" writes:
>
>> Le Dec 10, 2011 à 9:18 PM, David Kastrup a écrit :
>>
>>>
>>> Why don't we have \footnote \default for autonumbering (just like with
>>> \mark),
>>
>> We could...I don't understand how \default works, so I'm not sure how
>> to m
"m...@apollinemike.com" writes:
> Le Dec 10, 2011 à 9:18 PM, David Kastrup a écrit :
>
>>>
>>
>> Why don't we have \footnote \default for autonumbering (just like with
>> \mark),
>
> We could...I don't understand how \default works, so I'm not sure how
> to make it work here, but a tutorial wou
Le Dec 10, 2011 à 9:18 PM, David Kastrup a écrit :
>>
>
> Why don't we have \footnote \default for autonumbering (just like with
> \mark),
We could...I don't understand how \default works, so I'm not sure how to make
it work here, but a tutorial would get me on my way!
> and why can't \footn
George_ writes:
> pkx166h-2 wrote:
>>
>> George,
>>
>> On 30 November 2011 22:16, George Xu wrote:
>>
>>> Oops, sorry. 2.14.2. I guess that explains why \auto-footnote doesn't
>>> work, but it doesn't help much...
>>>
>>>
>> In the latest 'development' version
>>
>> http://lilypond.org/doc/v
mics, and \markup when using TextScripts); and \autoFootnote for
annotating chorded notes."
I feel it would be much clearer. Change in bold.
Thanks
George
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Footnotes-documentation-tp32885651p32952013.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - Us
George,
On 30 November 2011 22:16, George Xu wrote:
> Oops, sorry. 2.14.2. I guess that explains why \auto-footnote doesn't
> work, but it doesn't help much...
>
>
In the latest 'development' version
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/notation/creating-footnotes
This is explained in m
Oops, sorry. 2.14.2. I guess that explains why \auto-footnote doesn't work,
but it doesn't help much...
Thanks
George
On 1 December 2011 09:16, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
> On Nov 30, 2011, at 9:08 PM, George_ wrote:
>
> >
> > I'm confused by what the notation reference has to say about footn
On Nov 30, 2011, at 9:08 PM, George_ wrote:
>
> I'm confused by what the notation reference has to say about footnotes:
>
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/notation/other
>
> Regarding the example for \auto-footnote and \footnote (they are identical -
> why?), where do the 'b' and '
ly a footnote, but given that I can't get it
to print anything, even a working endnote would be an improvement.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Footnotes-documentation-tp32885651p32885651.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
15 matches
Mail list logo
