David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> writes:
> David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> writes:
>
>> "m...@apollinemike.com" <m...@apollinemike.com> writes:
>>
>>> Le Dec 10, 2011 à 9:18 PM, David Kastrup a écrit :
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Why don't we have \footnote \default for autonumbering (just like with
>>>> \mark),
>>>
>>> We could...I don't understand how \default works, so I'm not sure how
>>> to make it work here, but a tutorial would get me on my way!
>>
>> Have you read "Scheme function usage" in EG?
>>
>> Anyway, let's take a look at two contenders:
>>
>> autoFootnoteGrob =
>> #(define-music-function (parser location grob-name offset footnote)
>> (symbol? number-pair? markup?)
>> (_i "Footnote @var{grob-name} with the text in @var{footnote}
>> allowing for the footnote to be automatically numbered such that
>> the number appears at @var{offset}. Note that, for this to take effect,
>> auto-numbering must be turned on in the paper block. Otherwise, no
>> number will appear. Use like @code{\\once})")
>
> Just seen "auto-numbering must be turned on in the paper block". Is
> there a use case where turning it off might make any sense? You have a
> per-event property of autonumbering anyway, don't you?
And "Use like @code{\once})" is nonsense even discounting the closing
paren. "Affects all grobs in the current time step like
@code{\once\override}" is presumably what you mean.
--
David Kastrup
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
