Thanks Valentin,
> It is now: http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=769
_
Quante ne sai? Scoprilo con CrossWire!
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/140630367/direct/01/___
lilypond-
2009/4/10 Graham Percival :
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 03:08:32AM -0700, MonAmiPierrot wrote:
>> For me, I only use "\repeat percent" and most of all "\repeat
>> tremolo". In both cases, audio output is important. At least
>> for tremolos, you'll perfectly agree that there's no point in
>> not play
> "Kees" == Kees van den Doel writes:
Kees> I would also prefer \unfoldRepeats to be the default. I
Kees> frequently use the midi as practice material for the
Kees> musicians. It's also good to have the repeats in the midi
Kees> for listening checks to make sure you have all
> > I wonder why I (and, as I can imagine, 99% of users out there)
> have always
> > to put \unfoldRepeats in a different \score block just for
> correct MIDI
> > output, thus having to put in a variable all the \score
> content and use it
> > in both \score blocks.
I would also prefer \unfold
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 09:28:22AM -0700, MonAmiPierrot wrote:
>
> On unfoldTremolo, I'll give a try, but if you confirm it works, I don't see
> a reason not to implement it in next Lilypond version. What I suggest is to
> having it work BY DEFAULT, cause 99,9% of tremolo users would switch it on
MonAmiPierrot wrote:
> On unfoldTremolo, I'll give a try, but if you
> confirm it works, I don't see a reason not to
> implement it in next Lilypond version. What I
> suggest is to having it work BY DEFAULT, cause
> 99,9% of tremolo users would switch it on if
> they use MIDI output.
I don't ty
Jay Anderson wrote:
>
>
>
> It wouldn't be hard to have this also unfold percent repeats.
>
>
>
Of course, tremolos were the most important.
I'm with Hu: double tremolo notes are a must. They take the 90% of tremolos
I find in my work.
But if your \tremolos code works you'll save a huge a
MonAmiPierrot hotmail.com> writes:
> P.S. Perhaps, the \unfoldRepeats behaviour should be the default behaviour
> in case of "\repeat percent/tremolo", and not for "\repeat volta" (or
> additionally in voltas also in case of different "alternative" endings). I
> would like to know your (and all) o
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 03:08:32AM -0700, MonAmiPierrot wrote:
>
> Graham Percival-3 wrote:
> >
> >
> > I *never* put \unfoldRepeats. If you want real music, listen to
> > musicians.
> >
> Uhm... so, why don't we abolish \midi output?
Because you cut out the relevant part of the quote. \mid
Graham Percival-3 wrote:
>
>
> I *never* put \unfoldRepeats. If you want real music, listen to
> musicians.
>
Uhm... so, why don't we abolish \midi output?
I undestand what you said. It's because you mostly use \repeat for just
"\repeats volta", which I can understand is THE most used \rep
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 05:25:01PM +0800, Graham Percival wrote:
>> Fortunately, there's a simple way for both of us to be happy: the
>> status pro.
>
> *facepalms*
>
> I cannot believe I just wrote that.
In dubio prosecco.
Werner
___
lilypo
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 05:25:01PM +0800, Graham Percival wrote:
> Fortunately, there's a simple way for both of us to be happy: the
> status pro.
*facepalms*
I cannot believe I just wrote that.
Cheers,
- Graham "I'm a writer!" Percival
___
lilypond-
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 01:57:12AM -0700, MonAmiPierrot wrote:
>
> I wonder why I (and, as I can imagine, 99% of users out there) have always
> to put \unfoldRepeats in a different \score block just for correct MIDI
> output, thus having to put in a variable all the \score content and use it
> in
Hello,
I wonder why I (and, as I can imagine, 99% of users out there) have always
to put \unfoldRepeats in a different \score block just for correct MIDI
output, thus having to put in a variable all the \score content and use it
in both \score blocks.
It's not -till now - a problem for me, but I
14 matches
Mail list logo
