child [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 7:59 PM
To: 'Mats Bengtsson'
Cc: 'Karl Hammar'; 'lilypond-user@gnu.org'
Subject: RE: Coexisting 2.8 with 2.4
The attached pdf shows the 2.4 default font set and cmr10. Doesn't seem to
be any ecmr10, at lea
Fairchild wrote:
Graham -
Some convert-ly experience, on the file just submitted to LSR as "File
Information". 2.4.6 to 2.8.5.
Finding a way to execute convert-ly took several hours of stumbling around.
Haven't succeeded from jEdit. Expected to find an .exe file. A way that
works is to invo
2.8 with 2.4
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The attached pdf shows the 2.4 default font set and cmr10. Doesn't
seem to be any ecmr10, at least not with \override TextScript
#'font-name = #"ecmr10"
Your problem above is that you cannot refer to the font
with "ecmr10&
** Karl -
** Thanks for the response. See ** below.
** - Bruce
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Karl Hammar
Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2006 12:03 PM
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Coexisting 2.8 with 2.4
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> The attached pdf shows the 2.4 default font set and cmr10. Doesn't seem to
> be any ecmr10, at least not with \override TextScript #'font-name =
> #"ecmr10"
>
> - Bruce
...
Please don't toppost or cc me, I'm on the list.
A quick look through your pdf
Fairchild wrote:
Finding a way to execute convert-ly took several hours of stumbling around.
Haven't succeeded from jEdit. Expected to find an .exe file. A way that
works is to invoke with a DOS shell from the directory that contains
convert-ly.py and python.exe (and/or python2.4.exe?). Docume
Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Fairchild wrote:
>> Many have invested extensive effort in creating quality scores with various
>> versions.
>
> The "guidelines for writing lilypond files" section of the manual
> attempts to mitigate this. By writing lilypond files carefully, you ca
Mats wrote:
> ... Unfortunately, GSView doesn't
> accept LilyPond generated PostsScript files, otherwise viewing the PS
> files is a good alternative on most other operating systems.
>
Gsview works with LilyPond generated ps files if you add the path to
the fonts in GSview > Options > Configure
d horizontal spacing are quite different. A
show stopper. See attached files.
- Bruce (Also wondering "The reason why")
-Original Message-----
From: Graham Percival [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 02, 2006 12:55 PM
To: Fairchild
Cc: lilypond-us
mr10 (roman upright medium).
- Bruce
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Karl Hammar
Sent: Sunday, July 02, 2006 9:14 AM
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Coexisting 2.8 with 2.4
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Quotin
27;Thomas Scharkowski'; lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: RE: Coexisting 2.8 with 2.4
Quoting Fairchild <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Thomas, et. al. -
Successfully installed 2.8.5-1. Some findings and questions:
1) 2.8 adds to the PATH at installation - doesn't seem necessary.
Maybe not if you
Fairchild wrote:
Many have invested extensive effort in creating quality scores with various
versions.
The "guidelines for writing lilypond files" section of the manual
attempts to mitigate this. By writing lilypond files carefully, you can
reduce the problems associated with upgrading version
"D" } > } has changed syntax and result.
See ** inserts below.
- Bruce
-Original Message-
From: Mats Bengtsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 02, 2006 7:21 AM
To: Fairchild
Cc: 'Thomas Scharkowski'; lilypond-user@gnu.org
edium).
- Bruce
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Karl Hammar
Sent: Sunday, July 02, 2006 9:14 AM
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Coexisting 2.8 with 2.4
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Quoting Fairchild <[EMAI
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Quoting Fairchild <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
...
> > 3) How to get the 2.4 default font in 2.8?
>
> In 2.4, the only(!?) available fonts were the TeX fonts. In 2.8, you
> have access to all the fonts that are available
> in your other windows programs. However, I'm not sure how t
Quoting Fairchild <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Thomas, et. al. -
Successfully installed 2.8.5-1. Some findings and questions:
1) 2.8 adds to the PATH at installation - doesn't seem necessary.
Maybe not if you only access it via jEdit, but it's certainly
very convenient if you want to call LilyPond
PM
To: Fairchild
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: RE: Coexisting 2.8 with 2.4
> Thomas, et. al. -
>
> 9) Your signature tag implies you juggle three LilyPond versions.
> How?
Hello Bruce,
I have kept the cygwin version (2.4.6) because it does not interfere
with the native windows versio
> Thomas, et. al. -
>
> 9) Your signature tag implies you juggle three LilyPond versions.
> How?
Hello Bruce,
I have kept the cygwin version (2.4.6) because it does not interfere
with the native windows version(s) and it still works (indeed I
haven't used it for some time).
Normally I only u
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Coexisting 2.8 with 2.4
> I don't see how jEdit can handle both. Two incarnations of jEdit? Can
> one instantiation easily flip among multiple installed LilyPond
> versions? Alt-l now executes 2.4. Is there a way to set
> I don't see how jEdit can handle both. Two incarnations of jEdit?
> Can one instantiation easily flip among multiple installed LilyPond
> versions? Alt-l now executes 2.4. Is there a way to set another
> shortcut, say Alt-y, to execute 2.8? (Using jEdit 4.2 and LilyTool
> 0.2.8.)
...
>
> -
I don't see anything LilyPond on the PATH. So 2.4 and 2.8 should live in
the same house without being aware of each other's existence.
I don't see how jEdit can handle both. Two incarnations of jEdit? Can one
instantiation easily flip among multiple installed LilyPond versions? Alt-l
now execu
21 matches
Mail list logo
