** Karl - ** Thanks for the response. See ** below.
** - Bruce -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Karl Hammar Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2006 12:03 PM To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: Coexisting 2.8 with 2.4 [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > The attached pdf shows the 2.4 default font set and cmr10. Doesn't > seem to be any ecmr10, at least not with \override TextScript > #'font-name = #"ecmr10" > > - Bruce ... Please don't toppost or cc me, I'm on the list. ** Necessary to bypass the moderator. A quick look through your pdf gives me that you are showing the difference between the original TeX encoding (OT1) and the newer one with latin-1 characters (T1, dc, ec or cork encoding). The glyphs seem to be identical. Your problem above is that you cannot refer to the font with "ecmr10". You have them somewhere since lilypond uses them. ** That's what I have thought. Any idea what the file name is, where it lives, or how to access it if the default is changed? Use the link provided earlier to get the corresponding type1 fonts. ** I'm font-challenged. Other than the links you have provided, can you recommend an educational source? Regards, /Karl _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
