Hi Urs,
> Opinions?
I agree with Gould: (b), with the one adjustment, is superior.
> what this seems to call for is an update
> to the beaming pattern calculation, something like (an optional) "do not
> further subdivide a group that already has exactly four notes" rule. But
> somehow I'm afraid
Another puzzle/quiz/poll on beaming patterns for today.
Consider the attached renderings of a phrase with many notes, many beams
and inconsistent note durations (=> beam count). a) is rendered with a
base duration of 1/8 b) with 1/16.
(Note that unlike my previous post this is *not* about choosin
