Hi Urs, > Opinions?
I agree with Gould: (b), with the one adjustment, is superior. > what this seems to call for is an update > to the beaming pattern calculation, something like (an optional) "do not > further subdivide a group that already has exactly four notes" rule. But > somehow I'm afraid of skating on thin ice when going into that direction. Yeah… As soon as you get into tuplets, that ice gets even thinner. :\ Not sure how to advise. But many many thanks for you efforts in this area — it’s bound to make a huge positive difference! Best, Kieren. ________________________________ Kieren MacMillan, composer ‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info ‣ email: i...@kierenmacmillan.info _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
