I was able to use 2.1.x almost right away. I guess waiting 3
subversions wasn't enough.
Will
On Jun 2, 2004, at 2:47 PM, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
I hope you don't expect the unstable development version 2.3.3
to work correctly in all aspects, especially not when it comes to
page layout which is subj
I hope you don't expect the unstable development version 2.3.3
to work correctly in all aspects, especially not when it comes to
page layout which is subject to heavy reorganization for the moment.
If I were you, I would revert back to 2.2.2 for any serious typesetting
and wait for 2.3.x to stabili
On Jun 1, 2004, at 11:23 PM, Will Oram wrote:
I just made the jump from 2.2.2 to 2.3.3.
Before, my orchestral score was looking fine on PDF. As many staves
that could fit on one page without feeling cramped, were put on one
page. With 2.3, there is an EXTREME case of staves overlapping. The
way
I just made the jump from 2.2.2 to 2.3.3.
Before, my orchestral score was looking fine on PDF. As many staves
that could fit on one page without feeling cramped, were put on one
page. With 2.3, there is an EXTREME case of staves overlapping. The way
it looks now, the upper quarter of page 1 is c
