Quoting Simon Albrecht (simon.albre...@mail.de):
> On 26.09.2015 19:18, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> >>I just said that because often Elaine Gould is used as kind of a bible
> >>and as normative reference, whereas a notable part of her statements
> >>are personal suggestions and a matter of style or pre
On 26.09.2015 19:18, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
I just said that because often Elaine Gould is used as kind of a bible
and as normative reference, whereas a notable part of her statements
are personal suggestions and a matter of style or preference. She’s
just the only one who has made a comprehensive
> I just said that because often Elaine Gould is used as kind of a bible
> and as normative reference, whereas a notable part of her statements
> are personal suggestions and a matter of style or preference. She’s
> just the only one who has made a comprehensive publication on the
> topic (with St
Simon Albrecht writes:
> On 26.09.2015 16:14, Brian Barker wrote:
>> At 11:36 26/09/2015 +0100, Ant Youngman wrote:
>>> Actually, printing bar numbers at the start of each line is NOT
>>> general practice. Yes I think it's great, and leave it there when
>>> I'm redoing parts, but I've almost neve
On 26.09.2015 16:22, Brian Barker wrote:
At 16:15 26/09/2015 +0200, Simon Albrecht wrote:
On 26.09.2015 16:14, Brian Barker wrote:
Just to add another statistic: ...
Which is only one opinion.
Isn't that what "another statistic" means?
(Mind you, the unqualified suggestion of the Senior Ne
At 16:15 26/09/2015 +0200, Simon Albrecht wrote:
On 26.09.2015 16:14, Brian Barker wrote:
Just to add another statistic: ...
Which is only one opinion.
Isn't that what "another statistic" means?
(Mind you, the unqualified suggestion of the Senior New Music Editor
at Faber Music since 1987
On 26.09.2015 16:14, Brian Barker wrote:
At 11:36 26/09/2015 +0100, Ant Youngman wrote:
Actually, printing bar numbers at the start of each line is NOT
general practice. Yes I think it's great, and leave it there when I'm
redoing parts, but I've almost never seen it in any music I've been
give
At 11:36 26/09/2015 +0100, Ant Youngman wrote:
Actually, printing bar numbers at the start of each line is NOT
general practice. Yes I think it's great, and leave it there when
I'm redoing parts, but I've almost never seen it in any music I've
been given to play.
Just to add another statistic
Am 26.09.2015 um 13:02 schrieb David Kastrup:
[...]
Conductor: "Ok, let's start over from bar 1!"
Viola section: "We don't have bar numbers in our sheets."
:-)
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listin
On 26.09.2015 12:36, Wols Lists wrote:
On 26/09/15 08:31, Andrew Bernard wrote:
However, you don’t often see scores with every barline numbered, and generally
publishers only print the bar number at the start of each line, and normally
leaving out 1.
Actually, printing bar numbers at the star
Hi Wols,
> Actually, printing bar numbers at the start of each line is NOT general
> practice. Yes I think it's great, and leave it there when I'm redoing
> parts, but I've almost never seen it in any music I've been given to play.
1. Almost all of the hand-engravings I have from “the big houses”
Hi Wols,
The Henle Verlag keyboard editions pretty much all have a bar number at the
start of each line. I suppose that’s what I am referring to.
Andrew
On 26/09/2015, 20:36, "Wols Lists"
wrote:
>
>Actually, printing bar numbers at the start of each line is NOT general
>practice. Yes I t
Wols Lists writes:
> On 26/09/15 08:31, Andrew Bernard wrote:
>> However, you don’t often see scores with every barline numbered, and
>> generally publishers only print the bar number at the start of each
>> line, and normally leaving out 1.
>
> Actually, printing bar numbers at the start of each
On 26/09/15 08:31, Andrew Bernard wrote:
> However, you don’t often see scores with every barline numbered, and
> generally publishers only print the bar number at the start of each line, and
> normally leaving out 1.
Actually, printing bar numbers at the start of each line is NOT general
practi
On 26/09/15 09:52, T. Michael Sommers wrote:
> and if the numbers usually appear at the start of the line (which also
> appears odd to me)
Think of using a bar number as a rehearsal mark. If you say "start at
bar 17", and that is a rehearsal mark, it would be well weird if the
mark was placed betw
On Sat, 26 Sep 2015, Klaus Blum wrote:
> The last barline belongs to a bar that doesn't "exist" because there is no
> contents left.
That's one reason I suggested treating numbers as referring to boundaries,
not to the music between the boundaries. There is a bar line at the end;
that boundary ex
On 9/26/2015 3:41 AM, Andrew Bernard wrote:
Well, to align the numbers more inside the bar they relate to, add:
\override Score.BarNumber.self-alignment-X = #-1
Thanks.
--
T.M. Sommers -- tmsomme...@gmail.com -- ab2sb
___
lilypond-user mailing l
On 9/26/2015 3:54 AM, msk...@ansuz.sooke.bc.ca wrote:
On Sat, 26 Sep 2015, Andrew Bernard wrote:
The output is normal and correct. What may be putting you off is that
with the default fonts, under 2.19.27 at least, the numerals are aligned
slightly to the left of the barline, perhaps giving the
On 9/26/2015 3:31 AM, Andrew Bernard wrote:
The output is normal and correct. What may be putting you off is that
with the default fonts, under 2.19.27 at least, the numerals are
aligned slightly to the left of the barline, perhaps giving the
impression they belong to the bar before.
That is ex
. Hence,
it's better to use
\override Score.BarNumber.break-visibility = ##(#f #t #t)
Cheers,
Klaus
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Bar-numbers-seem-to-be-one-off-tp181720p181730.html
Sent from
On 9/26/2015 3:41 AM, bobr...@centrum.is wrote:
I think maybe you did not understand clearly what David Kastrup said.
When counting bar numbers, incomplete bars at the beginning are *not*
counted.
No, I understand. The posted example is just part of a larger score.
The rests are there becaus
On Sat, 26 Sep 2015, Andrew Bernard wrote:
> The output is normal and correct. What may be putting you off is that
> with the default fonts, under 2.19.27 at least, the numerals are aligned
> slightly to the left of the barline, perhaps giving the impression they
> belong to the bar before. The do
Well, to align the numbers more inside the bar they relate to, add:
\override Score.BarNumber.self-alignment-X = #-1
Andrew
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
- Original Message -
> From: "T. Michael Sommers"
> To: "Lilypond-User Mailing List"
> Sent: Saturday, September 26, 2015 6:37:17 AM
> Subject: Re: Bar numbers seem to be one off
>
> On 9/26/2015 1:53 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
> > "T.
The output is normal and correct. What may be putting you off is that with the
default fonts, under 2.19.27 at least, the numerals are aligned slightly to the
left of the barline, perhaps giving the impression they belong to the bar
before. The do indeed relate to the proper bar, and this is nor
On 9/26/2015 1:53 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
"T. Michael Sommers" writes:
It seems that unless I put a
\set Score.currentBarNumber = #0
at the top of a score, the bar numbers that get printed are one higher
than they should be. For instance, this, with the above line
commented out, la
"T. Michael Sommers" writes:
> It seems that unless I put a
>
> \set Score.currentBarNumber = #0
>
> at the top of a score, the bar numbers that get printed are one higher
> than they should be. For instance, this, with the above line
> commented out, labels the first bar "2". What am I mi
It seems that unless I put a
\set Score.currentBarNumber = #0
at the top of a score, the bar numbers that get printed are one higher
than they should be. For instance, this, with the above line commented
out, labels the first bar "2". What am I missing?
- snip -
\version "2.
28 matches
Mail list logo
