Re: Bar check fail with pick-ups in repeats

2012-09-17 Thread Nick Payne
On 18/09/12 07:01, Christopher R. Maden wrote: > On 09/17/2012 02:32 PM, Nick Payne wrote: > > \partial should only be used at the start of a piece. I don't have > > the 2.12 docs, > > http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/Documentation/user/lilypond/Long-repeats#Long-repeats > > , which recommends: > > \

Re: Bar check fail with pick-ups in repeats

2012-09-17 Thread Christopher R. Maden
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/17/2012 02:32 PM, Nick Payne wrote: > \partial should only be used at the start of a piece. I don't have > the 2.12 docs, http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/Documentation/user/lilypond/Long-repeats#Long-repeats > , which recommends: \partial 4 \repe

Re: Bar check fail with pick-ups in repeats

2012-09-17 Thread Nick Payne
On 18/09/12 01:32, Christopher R. Maden wrote: > On 09/17/2012 01:02 AM, Nathan wrote: > > Is this what you want? > > > \set Timing.measureLength = #(ly:make-moment 3 4) > > How is that different from \partial 4*3? > > I ended up using \partial 4*3 in the short alternative endings, which > results

Re: Bar check fail with pick-ups in repeats

2012-09-17 Thread Christopher R. Maden
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/17/2012 01:02 AM, Nathan wrote: > Is this what you want? > > \set Timing.measureLength = #(ly:make-moment 3 4) How is that different from \partial 4*3? I ended up using \partial 4*3 in the short alternative endings, which results in correct la

Re: Bar check fail with pick-ups in repeats

2012-09-16 Thread Keith OHara
Christopher R. Maden maden.org> writes: > It appears that the incomplete bar in the first alternative is > carrying over into the second, which is nonsensical. Yes. LilyPond counts beats straight through the repeats. Someday someone will volunteer the effort to improve that. Until then, you s

Re: Bar check fail with pick-ups in repeats

2012-09-16 Thread Nathan
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Christopher R. Maden wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Why does the attached file fail? > > Simplified: > > c c c c | c c c |: c | c c c c | 1. c c c :| 2. c c c c | c c c c || > > It seems to me, according to what (I recall that) I learn

Bar check fail with pick-ups in repeats

2012-09-16 Thread Christopher R. Maden
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Why does the attached file fail? Simplified: c c c c | c c c |: c | c c c c | 1. c c c :| 2. c c c c | c c c c || It seems to me, according to what (I recall that) I learned throughout school, that this is correct; and when unfolded, all the bar lin