On 8/13/08 1:38 PM, "Neil Puttock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What's the status of jazz-chord-names; is it also to be removed?
My reading on Han-Wen's comment was not that he was going to remove
Banter, but that he was OK to have it removed.
Right now, I'm not going to jump into removing Ba
What's the status of jazz-chord-names; is it also to be removed?
If you have a look at the chord chart, you'll see it's broken in
several ways, mainly due to the legacy code which it shares with
banter-chord-names:
- the chord name separator is blank
- chord name exceptions get ignored
Are chord
I am fine with dropping this code.
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Carl D. Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> First question: Does anybody know when Banter chord naming quit working?
> Second question: Does anybody care that Banter chord naming doesn't work?
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMA
-- Forwarded Message
From: "Carl D. Sorensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 05:19:19 -0600
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, lily-devel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Conversation: Banter chord naming convention
Subject: Banter chord naming convention
In responding to T
