On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 3:58 AM, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Aug 2008 17:03:58 -0700
> "Patrick McCarty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> You do raise a lot of interesting points though. I'm not the best
>> person to address these concerns though.
>
> No he doesn't. At le
On Tue, 5 Aug 2008 17:03:58 -0700
"Patrick McCarty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You do raise a lot of interesting points though. I'm not the best
> person to address these concerns though.
No he doesn't. At least, he hasn't raised any new points, nor
anything that we haven't considered.
2.12
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 4:05 PM, Steve Dunlop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You don't get it. If you have an archive like Mutopia, where there are
> thousands of files and dozens of contributors, and mixed dependencies on
> versions, running conver-ly doesn't work.
>
> It doesn't work because two
> This has been discussed numerous times on the mailing list. Check the
> archives.
>
> Handling syntax changes such as \compressMusic --> \scaleDurations are
> easily handled by convert-ly, since there is no change in structure of
> the input file. Simply use the following command:
>
> $ co
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 3:33 PM, Steve Dunlop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> You have absolutely no idea how much chaos things like this cause for
> people who are using Lilypond for major projects. You have absolutely
> no idea how much of a problem this sort of thing is for archives like
> M
You have absolutely no idea how much chaos things like this cause for
people who are using Lilypond for major projects. You have absolutely
no idea how much of a problem this sort of thing is for archives like
Mutopia. You have no idea how the lack of input grammar stability
undermines efforts
