On Tue, 5 Aug 2008 17:03:58 -0700 "Patrick McCarty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You do raise a lot of interesting points though. I'm not the best > person to address these concerns though. No he doesn't. At least, he hasn't raised any new points, nor anything that we haven't considered. 2.12 should be the last time there's major syntax changes. I've done everything possible to include more people in lilypond development and discussing syntax changes. You'd have to be hiding under a rock to not notice everything GDP has been doing, both in terms of docs *and* in terms of improving lilypond usability. I have absolutely no sympathy for people who complain after the fact when they've done nothing to get involved previously. If you want stability, use 2.10. If you can handle unstability, use 2.11. But don't complain when the unstable branch is MAOING UNSTABLE. Updating your syntax once a year when a new stable version comes out is no big deal. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
