Hi David,
thanks but that doesn't help, because no, I'm no "setting quartets" but
"anything":
Am 14.02.2018 um 01:30 schrieb David Wright:
until I find something that promises
to work generically (i.e. when I don't know the actual music and
page layout beforehand)?
IIRC you're setting quart
On Tue 13 Feb 2018 at 21:41:01 (+0100), Urs Liska wrote:
> I know that the music can't be properly printed with the given
> combination of paper size, margins and staffsize. But I want
> LilyPond to prefer the solution with two systems per page (in this
> example) because the compressed variant is
Hi Torsten,
thank you for these experiments and thoughts which will probably bring
me forward. Although they essentially miss the point - probably I should
have copied more information from the earlier thread.
Am 13.02.2018 um 20:45 schrieb Torsten Hämmerle:
Hi Urs,
With the top and bottom
Hi Urs,
With the top and bottom fixed, the only flexibility left lies in varying the
distances between systems and staves.
Unfortunately, the system-system-spacing has a default minimum distance of 8
(between the systems) and squeezing three systems into one page seems to be
better than stretching
Hi all,
recently
(http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2018-01/msg00576.html)
I asked about how to use the vertical spacing variables to force the top
system to an absolute position, which I could achieve with the
basic-distance and minimal-distance of top-system-spacing and its
s
