On Mon, 07 Sep 2009 11:15:21 +1000
Peter Chubb wrote:
> > "Grammostola" == Grammostola Rosea writes:
>
> Grammostola> David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
> >>>
> >> Again, why not get in touch with the developer(s) of midge? The
> >> syntax is completely different, but it is *text-based* and GNU.
> "Grammostola" == Grammostola Rosea writes:
Grammostola> David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
>>>
>> Again, why not get in touch with the developer(s) of midge? The
>> syntax is completely different, but it is *text-based* and GNU. It
>> is dedicated to midi, not notation. Why not find a way to us
> "Grammostola" == Grammostola Rosea writes:
Grammostola> David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
>>>
>> Again, why not get in touch with the developer(s) of midge? The
>> syntax is completely different, but it is *text-based* and GNU. It
>> is dedicated to midi, not notation. Why not find a way to us
David Raleigh Arnold a écrit :
On Sun, 06 Sep 2009 20:49:50 +0200
Grammostola Rosea wrote:
David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
On Sun, 6 Sep 2009 18:53:37 +0100
Graham Percival wrote:
On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 12:23:28PM +0200, Grammostola Rosea wrote:
@ Valentin, yeah would be nice if we co
> "Peter" == Peter Chubb writes:
Peter> You probably have dash installed as the system shell. Here's
Peter> an updated verion of the script that will work with Dash, and
Peter> will *still* work on POSIX compliant shells, but will no longer
Peter> work with the traditional Korn shell.
Arrr
On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 7:49 PM, David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
> Again, why not get in touch with the developer(s) of midge? The
> syntax is completely different, but it is *text-based* and GNU.
Perhaps the newly-created `midi' mailing list could provide us (and
them) with a convenient place to get w
> "Grammostola" == Grammostola Rosea writes:
Grammostola> Peter Chubb wrote:
Grammostola> When using lilywrap I get:
Grammostola> lilywrap dynamics.ly /usr/local/bin/lilywrap: 23: Syntax
Grammostola> error: "(" unexpected
Hmmm. Are you using a non-standard /bin/sh ??? It sounds like you'r
On Sun, 06 Sep 2009 20:49:50 +0200
Grammostola Rosea wrote:
> David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
> > On Sun, 6 Sep 2009 18:53:37 +0100
> > Graham Percival wrote:
> >
> >
> >> On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 12:23:28PM +0200, Grammostola Rosea wrote:
> >>
> >>> @ Valentin, yeah would be nice if we could
On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 01:49:12PM -0400, David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Sep 2009 18:53:37 +0100
> Graham Percival wrote:
>
> > Of course there's nothing wrong with having both! However, nobody
> > else wants to work on midi output.
>
> Again, why not get in touch with the developer(s)
David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
On Sun, 6 Sep 2009 18:53:37 +0100
Graham Percival wrote:
On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 12:23:28PM +0200, Grammostola Rosea wrote:
@ Valentin, yeah would be nice if we could improve the midi output by
default. I can remember I mentioned this before, but one comme
On Sun, 6 Sep 2009 18:53:37 +0100
Graham Percival wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 12:23:28PM +0200, Grammostola Rosea wrote:
> > @ Valentin, yeah would be nice if we could improve the midi output by
> > default. I can remember I mentioned this before, but one comment (not
> > from you) was t
On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 12:23:28PM +0200, Grammostola Rosea wrote:
> @ Valentin, yeah would be nice if we could improve the midi output by
> default. I can remember I mentioned this before, but one comment (not
> from you) was that Lilypond was mainly a notation typesetter... And
> while been
Peter Chubb wrote:
"Grammostola" == Grammostola Rosea writes:
Grammostola> But I got this message:
Grammostola> d...@debian:~/lilypondfiles$ lilywrap lilywraptest.ly
Grammostola> /usr/local/lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond: unrecognized
Grammostola> option: `--midi'
Here's an updated
Peter Chubb wrote:
"Grammostola" == Grammostola Rosea writes:
Grammostola> But I got this message:
Grammostola> d...@debian:~/lilypondfiles$ lilywrap lilywraptest.ly
Grammostola> /usr/local/lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond: unrecognized
Grammostola> option: `--midi'
Here's an updated
Peter Chubb wrote:
"Grammostola" == Grammostola Rosea writes:
Grammostola> But I got this message:
Grammostola> d...@debian:~/lilypondfiles$ lilywrap lilywraptest.ly
Grammostola> /usr/local/lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond: unrecognized
Grammostola> option: `--midi'
Here's an updated
> "Grammostola" == Grammostola Rosea writes:
Grammostola> But I got this message:
Grammostola> d...@debian:~/lilypondfiles$ lilywrap lilywraptest.ly
Grammostola> /usr/local/lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond: unrecognized
Grammostola> option: `--midi'
Here's an updated lilywrap script.
You don't
On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 12:02 AM, Peter
Chubb wrote:
> Not yet.
This won't go forgotten as long as I have anything to do with LilyPond :-)
(I could open a tracker page if that may help)
> Looks like the code in lilywrap.sh that tries to work out what
> arguments to give Lilypond to generate just
> "Grammostola" == Grammostola Rosea writes:
Grammostola> Grammostola Rosea wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was wondering if the acticulate midi script is already in
>> Lilypond?
Not yet.
>>
>> http://www.nicta.com.au/people/chubbp/articulate
>>
>>
>> I put articulate.ly in my lilypondfiles folde
Grammostola Rosea wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if the acticulate midi script is already in Lilypond?
http://www.nicta.com.au/people/chubbp/articulate
I put articulate.ly in my lilypondfiles folder and the script in
/usr/local/bin
But I got this message:
d...@debian:~/lilypondfiles$ lilywrap
Hi,
I was wondering if the acticulate midi script is already in Lilypond?
http://www.nicta.com.au/people/chubbp/articulate
I put articulate.ly in my lilypondfiles folder and the script in
/usr/local/bin
But I got this message:
d...@debian:~/lilypondfiles$ lilywrap lilywraptest.ly
/usr/loca
20 matches
Mail list logo
